Literature DB >> 18984453

Lowering radiation dose for integrated assessment of coronary morphology and physiology: first experience with step-and-shoot CT angiography in a rubidium 82 PET-CT protocol.

Mehrbod Javadi1, Mahadevappa Mahesh, Gerald McBride, Corina Voicu, William Epley, Jennifer Merrill, Frank M Bengel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reduction of radiation exposure from computed tomography coronary angiography (CTA) will be a key factor for more liberal use in cardiac hybrid positron emission tomography (PET)-computed tomography (CT). We report our initial experience with a new algorithm for low-dose CTA based on a prospectively gated step-and-shoot technique. This limits acquisition to the diastolic phase and minimizes exposure time versus the previous standard of retrospectively gated helical acquisitions. METHODS AND
RESULTS: In 15 consecutive patients referred for integrated functional and morphologic workup by rubidium 82 perfusion PET-CTA, step-and-shoot CTA (SnapShot Pulse; GE Medical Systems) (120 kV, 600-800 mA) was acquired on a 64-slice GE Discovery Rx VCT PET-CT scanner and compared with a group of patients with conventional helical CTA (120 kV, with modulation of the milliampere level) who were matched with regard to clinical variables. Effective dose was estimated from dose-length product. The American Heart Association 15-segment coronary tree model was used to determine study interpretability. Potential for fusion with Rb-82 perfusion PET was tested by use of commercial software. In addition, direct dose measurements were conducted by use of an anthropomorphic phantom for more accurate dosimetry. The dose-length product-derived effective patient dose for step-and-shoot and helical CTA was 5.5 +/- 0.1 mSv versus 20.5 +/- 3.5 mSv (P < .0001). The mean number of evaluable segments per patient for the best phase of helical CTA was 12.5 +/- 2.8 (83.3% +/- 18.7%) versus 13.3 +/- 2.2 (88.7% +/- 14.7%) (P = not significant vs helical) for step-and-shoot CTA. Review of multiple phases increased the number for helical CTA to 13.7 +/- 1.7 (91.3% +/- 11.3%; P = not significant vs step-and-shoot CTA, for which this was not an option). Semiautomated fusion with corresponding PET was feasible for all studies. Phantom data confirm effective doses of 5.4 mSv for step-and-shoot CTA and 19.6 mSv for helical acquisition.
CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose prospectively gated CTA reduces radiation exposure by nearly 70% versus the previous standard of helical acquisition, without significant loss in interpretability and integrative potential with Rb-82 perfusion PET. This represents a step toward a broader, routine integration of CTA and perfusion PET for assessment of coronary morphology and physiology by cardiac PET-CT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18984453     DOI: 10.1007/BF03007359

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  20 in total

1.  A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association.

Authors:  W G Austen; J E Edwards; R L Frye; G G Gensini; V L Gott; L S Griffith; D C McGoon; M L Murphy; B B Roe
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Step-and-shoot data acquisition and reconstruction for cardiac x-ray computed tomography.

Authors:  Jiang Hsieh; John Londt; Melissa Vass; Jay Li; Xiangyang Tang; Darin Okerlund
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Prospectively gated transverse coronary CT angiography versus retrospectively gated helical technique: improved image quality and reduced radiation dose.

Authors:  James P Earls; Elise L Berman; Bruce A Urban; Charlene A Curry; Judith L Lane; Robert S Jennings; Colin C McCulloch; Jiang Hsieh; John H Londt
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Hybrid PET/CT is greater than the sum of its parts.

Authors:  Marcelo F Di Carli; Rory Hachamovitch
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 5.  Physics of cardiac imaging with multiple-row detector CT.

Authors:  Mahadevappa Mahesh; Dianna D Cody
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 6.  Roles of nuclear cardiology, cardiac computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance: Noninvasive risk stratification and a conceptual framework for the selection of noninvasive imaging tests in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Daniel S Berman; Rory Hachamovitch; Leslee J Shaw; John D Friedman; Sean W Hayes; Louise E J Thomson; David S Fieno; Guido Germano; Nathan D Wong; Xingping Kang; Alan Rozanski
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Comparison of two methods for assessing patient dose from computed tomography.

Authors:  J Geleijns; J G Van Unnik; J Zoetelief; D Zweers; J J Broerse
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Value of vasodilator left ventricular ejection fraction reserve in evaluating the magnitude of myocardium at risk and the extent of angiographic coronary artery disease: a 82Rb PET/CT study.

Authors:  Sharmila Dorbala; Divya Vangala; Uchechukwu Sampson; Atul Limaye; Raymond Kwong; Marcelo F Di Carli
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  In vivo dosimetry for estimation of effective doses in multislice CT coronary angiography.

Authors:  M de Denaro; P Bregant; M Severgnini; F de Guarrini
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 10.  Clinical myocardial perfusion PET/CT.

Authors:  Marcelo F Di Carli; Sharmila Dorbala; Jolene Meserve; Georges El Fakhri; Arkadiusz Sitek; Stephen C Moore
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 10.057

View more
  11 in total

1.  Automatic alignment of myocardial perfusion PET and 64-slice coronary CT angiography on hybrid PET/CT.

Authors:  Ryo Nakazato; Damini Dey; Erick Alexánderson; Aloha Meave; Moisés Jiménez; Edgar Romero; Rodrigo Jácome; Marco Peña; Daniel S Berman; Piotr J Slomka
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Cardiac hybrid imaging with low radiation dose.

Authors:  Juhani Knuuti
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Myocardial perfusion imaging with first-pass computed tomographic imaging: Measurement of coronary flow reserve in an animal model of regional hyperemia.

Authors:  Timothy F Christian; Mei Lee Frankish; Jennifer H Sisemoore; Madeline R Christian; George Gentchos; Stephen P Bell; Michael Jerosch-Herold
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Importance of consideration of radiation doses from cardiac imaging procedures and risks of cancer.

Authors:  George A Beller
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 5.  Radiation burden in myocardial imaging: an old concern in the new age of hi-tech, hybrid imaging.

Authors:  Giovanni Lucignani
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 6.  Current state of hybrid imaging: attenuation correction and fusion.

Authors:  Jonathon A Nye; Tracy L Faber
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-05-07       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 7.  Combined anatomic and perfusion imaging of the heart.

Authors:  Bilal Ali; Edward Hsiao; Marcelo F Di Carli
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 8.  Assessment of myocardial perfusion and function with PET and PET/CT.

Authors:  Mouaz H Al-Mallah; Arkadiusz Sitek; Stephen C Moore; Marcelo Di Carli; Sharmila Dorbala
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Hybrid cardiac imaging: SPECT/CT and PET/CT. A joint position statement by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), the European Society of Cardiac Radiology (ESCR) and the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology (ECNC).

Authors:  Albert Flotats; Juhani Knuuti; Matthias Gutberlet; Claudio Marcassa; Frank M Bengel; Philippe A Kaufmann; Michael R Rees; Birger Hesse
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Comprehensive adenosine stress perfusion MRI defines the etiology of chest pain in the emergency room: Comparison with nuclear stress test.

Authors:  Jens Vogel-Claussen; Jan Skrok; David Dombroski; Steven M Shea; Edward P Shapiro; Mark Bohlman; Christine H Lorenz; Joao A C Lima; David A Bluemke
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.813

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.