Literature DB >> 16818945

Roles of nuclear cardiology, cardiac computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance: Noninvasive risk stratification and a conceptual framework for the selection of noninvasive imaging tests in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease.

Daniel S Berman1, Rory Hachamovitch, Leslee J Shaw, John D Friedman, Sean W Hayes, Louise E J Thomson, David S Fieno, Guido Germano, Nathan D Wong, Xingping Kang, Alan Rozanski.   

Abstract

This review deals with noninvasive imaging for risk stratification and with a conceptual approach to the selection of noninvasive tests in patients with suspected or known chronic coronary artery disease (CAD). Already widely acknowledged with SPECT, there is an increasing body of literature data demonstrating that CT coronary calcium assessment is also of prognostic value. The amount of coronary atherosclerosis, as can be extrapolated from CT coronary calcium score, has been shown to be highly predictive of cardiac events. The principal difference between myocardial perfusion SPECT (MPS) and CT coronary calcium for prognostic application appears to be that the former is an excellent tool for assessing short-term risk, thus effectively guiding decisions regarding revascularization. In contrast, the atherosclerosis imaging methods are likely to provide greater long-term risk assessment and, thus, are more useful in determination of the need for aggressive medical prevention measures. Although the more recent development of CT coronary angiography is promising for diagnosis, there has been no information to date regarding the prognostic value of the CT angiographic data. Similarly, cardiac MRI has not yet been adequately studied for its prognostic content. The selection of the most appropriate test for a given patient depends on the specific question being asked. In patients with a very low likelihood of CAD, no imaging test may be required. In screening the remaining asymptomatic patients, atherosclerosis imaging may be beneficial. In symptomatic patients, MPS, CT coronary angiography, and cardiac MRI play important roles. We consider it likely that, with an increased emphasis on prevention and a concomitant aging of the population, many forms of noninvasive cardiac imaging will continue to grow, with nuclear cardiology continuing to grow.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16818945

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  29 in total

Review 1.  Low dose CT of the heart: a quantum leap into a new era of cardiovascular imaging.

Authors:  E Maffei; C Martini; S De Crescenzo; T Arcadi; A Clemente; E Capuano; A Rossi; R Malagò; N Mollet; A Weustink; C Tedeschi; L La Grutta; S Seitun; A Igoren Guaricci; F Cademartiri
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Revascularize only for ischemia, especially if left ventricular function is poor.

Authors:  Mark I Travin
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Fourth annual Mario S. Verani, MD Memorial Lecture: noninvasive imaging in coronary artery disease: changing roles, changing players.

Authors:  Daniel S Berman
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 4.  Cardiac hybrid imaging.

Authors:  Oliver Gaemperli; Philipp A Kaufmann; Hatem Alkadhi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 5.  The incremental value of coronary artery calcium scores to myocardial single photon emission computer tomography in risk assessment.

Authors:  Marcus Hacker; Christoph Becker
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 6.  Non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: targeted imaging to refine upstream risk stratification.

Authors:  Henry Chang; James K Min; Sunil V Rao; Manesh R Patel; Orlando P Simonetti; Giuseppe Ambrosio; Subha V Raman
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 7.792

Review 7.  An integrated approach to coronary heart disease diagnosis and clinical management.

Authors:  Teresa Infante; Ernesto Forte; Concetta Schiano; Carlo Cavaliere; Carlo Tedeschi; Andrea Soricelli; Marco Salvatore; Claudio Napoli
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 4.060

8.  Lowering radiation dose for integrated assessment of coronary morphology and physiology: first experience with step-and-shoot CT angiography in a rubidium 82 PET-CT protocol.

Authors:  Mehrbod Javadi; Mahadevappa Mahesh; Gerald McBride; Corina Voicu; William Epley; Jennifer Merrill; Frank M Bengel
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Coronary 64-slice CT angiography predicts outcome in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Oliver Gaemperli; Ines Valenta; Tiziano Schepis; Lars Husmann; Hans Scheffel; Lotus Desbiolles; Sebastian Leschka; Hatem Alkadhi; Philipp A Kaufmann
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  The evolving roles of nuclear cardiology.

Authors:  Andrea De Lorenzo
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2009-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.