Literature DB >> 19921185

Radiation burden in myocardial imaging: an old concern in the new age of hi-tech, hybrid imaging.

Giovanni Lucignani1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2010        PMID： 19921185     DOI： 10.1007/s00259-009-1309-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN： 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


× No keyword cloud information.
  13 in total

1.  Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography coronary angiography and evaluation of stress-only single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography hybrid imaging: comparison of prospective electrocardiogram-triggering vs. retrospective gating.

Authors:  Lars Husmann; Bernhard A Herzog; Oliver Gaemperli; Fuminari Tatsugami; Nina Burkhard; Ines Valenta; Patrick Veit-Haibach; Christophe A Wyss; Ulf Landmesser; Philipp A Kaufmann
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 29.983

2.  Radiation risk from coronary artery disease imaging: how do different diagnostic tests compare?

Authors:  Andrew J Einstein
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Application of appropriateness criteria to stress single-photon emission computed tomography sestamibi studies and stress echocardiograms in an academic medical center.

Authors:  Raymond J Gibbons; Todd D Miller; David Hodge; Lynn Urban; Philip A Araoz; Patricia Pellikka; Robert B McCully
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Exposure to ionizing radiation from cardiovascular imaging and therapeutic procedures may be a considerable unrecognized risk for subsequent cancer development.

Authors:  Emmanouil N Karatzis; Peter G Danias
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 5.532

5.  Lowering radiation dose for integrated assessment of coronary morphology and physiology: first experience with step-and-shoot CT angiography in a rubidium 82 PET-CT protocol.

Authors:  Mehrbod Javadi; Mahadevappa Mahesh; Gerald McBride; Corina Voicu; William Epley; Jennifer Merrill; Frank M Bengel
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Radiation reduction with prospective ECG-triggering acquisition using 64-multidetector Computed Tomographic angiography.

Authors:  Ambarish Gopal; Song S Mao; Daniel Karlsberg; Emily Young; Joshua Waggoner; Naser Ahmadi; Raveen S Pal; John Leal; Ronald P Karlsberg; Matthew J Budoff
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Diagnostic efficacy of a low-dose 32-projection SPECT 99mTc-sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging protocol in routine practice.

Authors:  Ming-Che Wu; Kun-Chou Chin; Ku-Hung Lin; Nan-Tsing Chiu
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.690

8.  Radiation dose in a "triple rule-out" coronary CT angiography protocol of emergency department patients using 64-MDCT: the impact of ECG-based tube current modulation on age, sex, and body mass index.

Authors:  Kevin M Takakuwa; Ethan J Halpern; Eric L Gingold; David C Levin; Frances S Shofer
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Low radiation dose imaging of myocardial perfusion and coronary angiography with a hybrid PET/CT scanner.

Authors:  S Kajander; H Ukkonen; H Sipilä; M Teräs; J Knuuti
Journal:  Clin Physiol Funct Imaging       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 2.273

10.  Economic analysis including long-term risks and costs of alternative diagnostic strategies to evaluate patients with chest pain.

Authors:  Gigliola Bedetti; Emilio Maria Pasanisi; Carmine Pizzi; Giuseppe Turchetti; Cosimo Loré
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2008-05-29       Impact factor: 2.062
View more
  1 in total

1.  Radiation exposure, protection and risk from nuclear medicine procedures.

Authors:  Massimo Salvatori; Giovanni Lucignani
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 9.236
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.