Literature DB >> 20717824

Hybrid cardiac imaging: SPECT/CT and PET/CT. A joint position statement by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), the European Society of Cardiac Radiology (ESCR) and the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology (ECNC).

Albert Flotats1, Juhani Knuuti, Matthias Gutberlet, Claudio Marcassa, Frank M Bengel, Philippe A Kaufmann, Michael R Rees, Birger Hesse.   

Abstract

Improvements in software and hardware have enabled the integration of dual imaging modalities into hybrid systems, which allow combined acquisition of the different data sets. Integration of positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT) scanners into PET/CT systems has shown improvement in the management of patients with cancer over stand-alone acquired CT and PET images. Hybrid cardiac imaging either with single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) or PET combined with CT depicts cardiac and vascular anatomical abnormalities and their physiologic consequences in a single setting and appears to offer superior information compared with either stand-alone or side-by-side interpretation of the data sets in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). Hybrid systems are also advantageous for the patient because of the single short dual data acquisition. However, hybrid cardiac imaging has also generated controversy with regard to which patients should undergo such integrated examination for clinical effectiveness and minimization of costs and radiation dose, and if software-based fusion of images obtained separately would be a useful alternative. The European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), the European Society of Cardiac Radiology (ESCR) and the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology (ECNC) in this paper want to present a position statement of the institutions on the current roles of SPECT/CT and PET/CT hybrid cardiac imaging in patients with known or suspected CAD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20717824     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-010-1586-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  98 in total

Review 1.  Prognostic value of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT.

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw; Ami E Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 2.  Single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography: basic instrumentation and innovations.

Authors:  Michael K O'Connor; Brad J Kemp
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.446

Review 3.  Coronary CT angiography.

Authors:  Udo Hoffmann; Maros Ferencik; Ricardo C Cury; Antonio J Pena
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Independent and incremental prognostic value of left ventricular ejection fraction determined by stress gated rubidium 82 PET imaging in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Kirkeith Lertsburapa; Alan W Ahlberg; Timothy M Bateman; Deborah Katten; Lyndy Volker; S James Cullom; Gary V Heller
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Independent and incremental prognostic value of exercise single-photon emission computed tomographic (SPECT) thallium imaging in coronary artery disease.

Authors:  A S Iskandrian; S C Chae; J Heo; C D Stanberry; V Wasserleben; V Cave
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Coronary calcium as a predictor of coronary events in four racial or ethnic groups.

Authors:  Robert Detrano; Alan D Guerci; J Jeffrey Carr; Diane E Bild; Gregory Burke; Aaron R Folsom; Kiang Liu; Steven Shea; Moyses Szklo; David A Bluemke; Daniel H O'Leary; Russell Tracy; Karol Watson; Nathan D Wong; Richard A Kronmal
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  Cardiac hybrid imaging: state-of-the-art.

Authors:  Philipp A Kaufmann
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 2.668

8.  Optimal medical therapy with or without percutaneous coronary intervention to reduce ischemic burden: results from the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) trial nuclear substudy.

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw; Daniel S Berman; David J Maron; G B John Mancini; Sean W Hayes; Pamela M Hartigan; William S Weintraub; Robert A O'Rourke; Marcin Dada; John A Spertus; Bernard R Chaitman; John Friedman; Piotr Slomka; Gary V Heller; Guido Germano; Gilbert Gosselin; Peter Berger; William J Kostuk; Ronald G Schwartz; Merill Knudtson; Emir Veledar; Eric R Bates; Benjamin McCallister; Koon K Teo; William E Boden
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-02-11       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 9.  Anatomy and physiology of coronary blood flow.

Authors:  Heinrich R Schelbert
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 10.  Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy: the evidence.

Authors:  S R Underwood; C Anagnostopoulos; M Cerqueira; P J Ell; E J Flint; M Harbinson; A D Kelion; A Al-Mohammad; E M Prvulovich; L J Shaw; A C Tweddel
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 9.236

View more
  52 in total

Review 1.  Multimodality imaging in interventional cardiology.

Authors:  Bas L van der Hoeven; Martin J Schalij; Victoria Delgado
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  Sequential SPECT/CT imaging for detection of coronary artery disease in a large cohort: evaluation of the need for additional imaging and radiation exposure.

Authors:  Elsemiek M Engbers; Jorik R Timmer; Jan Paul Ottervanger; Mohamed Mouden; Ad H J Oostdijk; Siert Knollema; Pieter L Jager
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Attenuation correction in stress-only myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Aju P Pazhenkottil; Philipp A Kaufmann; Oliver Gaemperli
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 4.  Clinical use of quantitative cardiac perfusion PET: rationale, modalities and possible indications. Position paper of the Cardiovascular Committee of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM).

Authors:  Roberto Sciagrà; Alessandro Passeri; Jan Bucerius; Hein J Verberne; Riemer H J A Slart; Oliver Lindner; Alessia Gimelli; Fabien Hyafil; Denis Agostini; Christopher Übleis; Marcus Hacker
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  [Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: from imaging to diagnosis].

Authors:  M Gutberlet
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 0.635

6.  Comparative analysis of full-time, half-time, and quarter-time myocardial ECG-gated SPECT quantification in normal-weight and overweight patients.

Authors:  M Lecchi; I Martinelli; O Zoccarato; C Maioli; Giovanni Lucignani; A Del Sole
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Hybrid anatomo-functional imaging of coronary artery disease: Beneficial irrespective of its core components.

Authors:  Francesco Nudi; Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai; Andrea Romagnoli; Orazio Schillaci; Alessandro Nudi; Francesco Versaci
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 8.  Current state of hybrid imaging: attenuation correction and fusion.

Authors:  Jonathon A Nye; Tracy L Faber
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-05-07       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Does hybrid diagnostic imaging in cardiology have the same significance as in oncology?

Authors:  Panagiotis Georgoulias; Ioannis Tsougos; Varvara Valotassiou; Nikolaos Demakopoulos
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-02-19       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Incidental extra-cardiac findings on 13NH3 myocardial perfusion PET/CT.

Authors:  Andrei Iagaru
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 5.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.