Literature DB >> 20066526

Importance of consideration of radiation doses from cardiac imaging procedures and risks of cancer.

George A Beller.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2010        PMID： 20066526     DOI： 10.1007/s12350-009-9189-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN： 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


× No keyword cloud information.
  14 in total

1.  Cancer risks and radiation exposure from computed tomographic scans: how can we be sure that the benefits outweigh the risks?

Authors:  Rita F Redberg
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-12-14

2.  Medical radiation exposure in the U.S. in 2006: preliminary results.

Authors:  Fred A Mettler; Bruce R Thomadsen; Mythreyi Bhargavan; Debbie B Gilley; Joel E Gray; Jill A Lipoti; John McCrohan; Terry T Yoshizumi; Mahadevappa Mahesh
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.316

3.  Lowering radiation dose for integrated assessment of coronary morphology and physiology: first experience with step-and-shoot CT angiography in a rubidium 82 PET-CT protocol.

Authors:  Mehrbod Javadi; Mahadevappa Mahesh; Gerald McBride; Corina Voicu; William Epley; Jennifer Merrill; Frank M Bengel
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation from medical imaging procedures.

Authors:  Reza Fazel; Harlan M Krumholz; Yongfei Wang; Joseph S Ross; Jersey Chen; Henry H Ting; Nilay D Shah; Khurram Nasir; Andrew J Einstein; Brahmajee K Nallamothu
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Comparison of image quality and radiation dose of coronary computed tomographic angiography between conventional helical scanning and a strategy incorporating sequential scanning.

Authors:  Andrew J Einstein; Steven D Wolff; Eric D Manheimer; James Thompson; Sylvia Terry; Seth Uretsky; Adalbert Pilip; M Robert Peters
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2009-09-26       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Achieving an exercise workload of > or = 10 metabolic equivalents predicts a very low risk of inducible ischemia: does myocardial perfusion imaging have a role?

Authors:  Jamieson M Bourque; Benjamin H Holland; Denny D Watson; George A Beller
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 7.  Medical imaging: the radiation issue.

Authors:  Andrew J Einstein
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 32.419

8.  Radiation dose from cardiac computed tomography before and after implementation of radiation dose-reduction techniques.

Authors:  Gilbert L Raff; Kavitha M Chinnaiyan; David A Share; Tauqir Y Goraya; Ella A Kazerooni; Mauro Moscucci; Ralph E Gentry; Aiden Abidov
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Normal stress-only versus standard stress/rest myocardial perfusion imaging: similar patient mortality with reduced radiation exposure.

Authors:  Su Min Chang; Faisal Nabi; Jiaqiong Xu; Umara Raza; John J Mahmarian
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography.

Authors:  Andrew J Einstein; Milena J Henzlova; Sanjay Rajagopalan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-07-18       Impact factor: 56.272
View more
  8 in total

1.  Recommendations for reducing radiation exposure in myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira; Kevin C Allman; Edward P Ficaro; Christopher L Hansen; Kenneth J Nichols; Randall C Thompson; William A Van Decker; Marko Yakovlevitch
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 2.  SPECT imaging for detecting coronary artery disease and determining prognosis by noninvasive assessment of myocardial perfusion and myocardial viability.

Authors:  George A Beller; Ruth C Heede
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Feasibility of myocardial perfusion imaging with half the radiation dose using ordered-subset expectation maximization with resolution recovery software.

Authors:  Nili Zafrir; Alejandro Solodky; Avi Ben-Shlomo; Israel Mats; Roman Nevzorov; Alexander Battler; Ariel Gutstein
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Evaluation of general-purpose collimators against high-resolution collimators with resolution recovery with a view to reducing radiation dose in myocardial perfusion SPECT: A preliminary phantom study.

Authors:  Ian S Armstrong; Kimberley J Saint; Christine M Tonge; Parthiban Arumugam
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Feasibility of myocardial perfusion imaging with half the radiation dose in obese patients using ordered-subset expectation maximization with resolution recovery software.

Authors:  Nili Zafrir; Tamir Bental; Alejandro Solodky; Avi Ben-Shlomo; Israel Mats; Yosef Hassid; Doron Belzer; Alexander Battler; Ariel Gutstein
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-12-22       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Development of a Cost-Effective Modular Pixelated NaI(Tl) Detector for Clinical SPECT Applications.

Authors:  Mike Rozler; Haoning Liang; Wei Chang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 1.679

7.  The tools are ready, are we?

Authors:  Sang-Geon Cho; Zeenat Jabin; Changho Lee; Henry Hee-Seung Bom
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  Dynamic CT perfusion imaging of the myocardium: a technical note on improvement of image quality.

Authors:  Daniela Muenzel; Sven Kabus; Bettina Gramer; Vivian Leber; Mani Vembar; Holger Schmitt; Moritz Wildgruber; Alexander A Fingerle; Ernst J Rummeny; Armin Huber; Peter B Noël
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 3.240
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.