Literature DB >> 18981919

Is there evidence for continued learning over multiple years in perimetry?

Stuart K Gardiner1, Shaban Demirel, Chris A Johnson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The existence of learning effects in perimetry, whereby a subject's first test is more variable and has lower mean sensitivity (MS) than subsequent tests, is well established. However, studies have typically examined this issue by testing subjects at a frequency that would be unusual in a clinical setting. This study seeks to determine the validity of these conclusions for less frequent, yet more clinically realistic, testing rates.
METHODS: One hundred sixty eyes of 80 subjects with suspected or early glaucoma were included. Subjects were tested annually for 8 years using white-on-white standard automated perimetry (SAP) and short wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP). All subjects had undergone at least one test with both paradigms before entering the study.
RESULTS: For SAP, MS increased by 0.5 dB over the first year, and then showed no significant change until after year 5 (despite expected effects of aging and disease progression), after which it started to decline. For SWAP, MS of the average eye continued to improve until year 6 of the study.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings seem to indicate a prolonged learning effect for SWAP, with MS increasing for several years. A smaller prolonged learning effect may also be present for SAP, counteracting the effects of aging and disease progression. Deterioration of the subject's visual field may be underestimated within this period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18981919      PMCID: PMC2720782          DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31818b9b40

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  24 in total

1.  Discriminating between normal and glaucomatous eyes using the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph, GDx Nerve Fiber Analyzer, and Optical Coherence Tomograph.

Authors:  L M Zangwill; C Bowd; C C Berry; J Williams; E Z Blumenthal; C A Sánchez-Galeana; C Vasile; R N Weinreb
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-07

2.  Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from Full Threshold, SITA Standard, and SITA Fast strategies.

Authors:  Paul H Artes; Aiko Iwase; Yuko Ohno; Yoshiaki Kitazawa; Balwantray C Chauhan
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  The effect of perimetric experience in normal subjects.

Authors:  A Heijl; G Lindgren; J Olsson
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1989-01

4.  Comparison of long-term variability for standard and short-wavelength automated perimetry in stable glaucoma patients.

Authors:  E Z Blumenthal; P A Sample; L Zangwill; A C Lee; Y Kono; R N Weinreb
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  Characteristics of the normative database for the Humphrey matrix perimeter.

Authors:  Andrew John Anderson; Chris A Johnson; Murray Fingeret; John L Keltner; Paul G D Spry; Michael Wall; John S Werner
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Effect of patient experience on the results of automated perimetry in glaucoma suspect patients.

Authors:  E B Werner; T Krupin; A Adelson; M E Feitl
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Psychophysical investigation of ganglion cell loss in early glaucoma.

Authors:  Paul G D Spry; Chris A Johnson; Steven L Mansberger; George A Cioffi
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 8.  Short wavelength automated perimetry.

Authors:  J M Wild
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol Scand       Date:  2001-12

9.  Evidence for a learning effect in short-wavelength automated perimetry.

Authors:  John M Wild; Linda S Kim; Ian E Pacey; Ian A Cunliffe
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 10.  Relationship between structure of optic nerve/nerve fiber layer and functional measurements in glaucoma.

Authors:  Christopher A Girkin
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.761

View more
  21 in total

1.  Transcranial direct current stimulation affects visual perception measured by threshold perimetry.

Authors:  Antje Kraft; Jasper Roehmel; Manuel C Olma; Sein Schmidt; Kerstin Irlbacher; Stephan A Brandt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Reproducibility in the global indices for multifocal visual evoked potentials and Humphrey visual fields in controls and glaucomatous eyes within a 2-year period.

Authors:  Yukako Inoue; Kei Kato; Seiko Kamata; Kumiko Ishikawa; Makoto Nakamura
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Series length used during trend analysis affects sensitivity to changes in progression rate in the ocular hypertension treatment study.

Authors:  Stuart K Gardiner; Shaban Demirel; Carlos Gustavo De Moraes; Jeffrey M Liebmann; George A Cioffi; Robert Ritch; Mae O Gordon; Michael A Kass
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Nonlinear, multilevel mixed-effects approach for modeling longitudinal standard automated perimetry data in glaucoma.

Authors:  Manoj Pathak; Shaban Demirel; Stuart K Gardiner
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Differences in the Relation Between Perimetric Sensitivity and Variability Between Locations Across the Visual Field.

Authors:  Stuart K Gardiner
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Visual field improvement in the collaborative initial glaucoma treatment study.

Authors:  David C Musch; Brenda W Gillespie; Paul F Palmberg; George Spaeth; Leslie M Niziol; Paul R Lichter
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-04-12       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  Structural Measurements for Monitoring Change in Glaucoma: Comparing Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness With Minimum Rim Width and Area.

Authors:  Stuart K Gardiner; Pui Yi Boey; Hongli Yang; Brad Fortune; Claude F Burgoyne; Shaban Demirel
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Quantification of Visual Field Variability in Glaucoma: Implications for Visual Field Prediction and Modeling.

Authors:  Alessandro Rabiolo; Esteban Morales; Abdelmonem A Afifi; Fei Yu; Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi; Joseph Caprioli
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 3.283

9.  Lack of Visual Field Improvement After Initiation of Intraocular Pressure Reducing Treatment in the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial.

Authors:  Boel Bengtsson; Anders Heijl
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Comparison of SWAP and SAP on the point of glaucoma conversion.

Authors:  Ioannis Havvas; Dimitris Papaconstantinou; Marilita M Moschos; Panagiotis G Theodossiadis; Vasilios Andreanos; Pantelis Ekatomatis; Ioannis Vergados; Dimitrios Andreanos
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-09-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.