Literature DB >> 11782218

Short wavelength automated perimetry.

J M Wild1.   

Abstract

Short Wavelength Automated Perimetry (SWAP) utilizes a blue stimulus to preferentially stimulate the blue cones and a high luminance yellow background to adapt the green and red cones and to saturate, simultaneously, the activity of the rods. This review describes the theoretical aspects of SWAP, highlights current limitations associated with the technique and discusses potential clinical applications. Compared to white-on-white (W-W) perimetry, SWAP is limited clinically by: greater variability associated with the estimation of threshold, ocular media absorption, increased examination duration and an additional learning effect. Comparative studies of SWAP and W-W perimetry have generally been undertaken on small cohorts of patients. The conclusions are frequently unconvincing due to limitations for SWAP in the delineation of abnormality and of progressive field loss. SWAP is almost certainly able to identify glaucomatous visual field loss in advance of that by W-W perimetry although the incidence of progressive field loss is similar between the two techniques. Increasing evidence suggests that functional abnormality with SWAP is preceded by structural abnormality of the optic nerve head and/or the retinal nerve fibre layer. SWAP appears to be beneficial in the detection of diabetic macular oedema and possibly in some neuro-ophthalmic disorders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11782218     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0420.2001.790602.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol Scand        ISSN: 1395-3907


  15 in total

1.  Short wavelength automated perimetry and tamoxifen use.

Authors:  A Eisner; D F Austin; J R Samples
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  The distribution of visual field defects per quadrant in standard automated perimetry as compared to frequency doubling technology perimetry.

Authors:  Wadih M Zein; Ziad F Bashshur; Rola F Jaafar; Baha' N Noureddin
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 3.  [Functional glaucoma diagnosis].

Authors:  C Erb; K Göbel
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  [Conventional perimetry. Antiquated or indispensable for functional glaucoma diagnostics?].

Authors:  F Tonagel; B Voykov; U Schiefer
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  Frequency of seeing characteristics of the short wavelength sensitive visual pathway in clinically normal subjects and diabetic patients with focal sensitivity loss.

Authors:  E D Gilmore; C Hudson; R K Nrusimhadevara; P T Harvey
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Is there evidence for continued learning over multiple years in perimetry?

Authors:  Stuart K Gardiner; Shaban Demirel; Chris A Johnson
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.973

7.  Retrobulbar blood flow and visual field alterations after acute ethanol ingestion.

Authors:  Anke Weber; Andreas Remky; Marion Bienert; Klaudia Huber-van der Velden; Thomas Kirschkamp; Corinna Rennings; Gernot Roessler; Niklas Plange
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-08-19

8.  A limited role for suppression in the central field of individuals with strabismic amblyopia.

Authors:  Brendan T Barrett; Gurvinder K Panesar; Andrew J Scally; Ian E Pacey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Influence of ACPA-positive rheumatoid arthritis on visual field testing in patients with arterial hypertension: A comparative cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Jascha Wendelstein; Barbara Fuchs; Sarah Schlittgen; Robert Zielke; Jeanette Brünner; Matthias Bolz; Rielke Alten; Carl Erb
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  [Not Available].

Authors:  Carlo Aleci; Tiziana Usai
Journal:  Open Ophthalmol J       Date:  2008-11-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.