Yukako Inoue1, Kei Kato1, Seiko Kamata1, Kumiko Ishikawa1, Makoto Nakamura2. 1. Division of Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-1 Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, 650-0017, Japan. 2. Division of Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-1 Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, 650-0017, Japan. manakamu@med.kobe-u.ac.jp.
Abstract
PURPOSE: In previous studies, we applied receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to the signal-to-noise ratio distributions in the signal and noise windows of multifocal VEP (mfVEP) response. The areas under the curve thus obtained (SNR-AUC) were found to quantitatively detect glaucomatous visual field damage. The present study evaluated the reproducibility of SNR-AUC and the Humphrey visual field (HVF) global indices in 37 eyes with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG; POAG group) and in 30 controls (control group) within a 2-year period. METHODS: The HVF SITA standard 24-2 and mfVEP were recorded at three separate sessions for each individual. The intersession variability for SNR-AUC, mean deviation (MD), and pattern standard deviation (PSD) was evaluated using the repeated measures of analysis of variance and Bland-Altman plots. The logarithmically converted coefficients of variation (CV) of PSD and SNR-AUC were compared between the control and POAG groups. Linear regression analyses were performed on the logarithmic CV of SNR-AUC against the average MD, PSD, and SNR-AUC. RESULTS: SNR-AUC in the POAG group was significantly lower and its CV was greater compared with the control group (P < 0.0001). MD value recorded at the third visit had significantly improved than that at the first visit in the control group (analysis of variance, P = 0.03), whereas PSD value was significantly worse in the POAG group (P = 0.024). In the POAG group, SNR-AUC CV increased as the glaucoma stage became more advanced when evaluated by any functional parameters tested (i.e., MD, PSD, or SNR-AUC). CONCLUSIONS: The SNR-AUC of mfVEP showed a high reproducibility in control group, whereas it fluctuated more in the POAG group according to the disease severity. MD in the control group and PSD in POAG group fluctuated among sessions during the 2-year period.
PURPOSE: In previous studies, we applied receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to the signal-to-noise ratio distributions in the signal and noise windows of multifocal VEP (mfVEP) response. The areas under the curve thus obtained (SNR-AUC) were found to quantitatively detect glaucomatous visual field damage. The present study evaluated the reproducibility of SNR-AUC and the Humphrey visual field (HVF) global indices in 37 eyes with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG; POAG group) and in 30 controls (control group) within a 2-year period. METHODS: The HVF SITA standard 24-2 and mfVEP were recorded at three separate sessions for each individual. The intersession variability for SNR-AUC, mean deviation (MD), and pattern standard deviation (PSD) was evaluated using the repeated measures of analysis of variance and Bland-Altman plots. The logarithmically converted coefficients of variation (CV) of PSD and SNR-AUC were compared between the control and POAG groups. Linear regression analyses were performed on the logarithmic CV of SNR-AUC against the average MD, PSD, and SNR-AUC. RESULTS: SNR-AUC in the POAG group was significantly lower and its CV was greater compared with the control group (P < 0.0001). MD value recorded at the third visit had significantly improved than that at the first visit in the control group (analysis of variance, P = 0.03), whereas PSD value was significantly worse in the POAG group (P = 0.024). In the POAG group, SNR-AUC CV increased as the glaucoma stage became more advanced when evaluated by any functional parameters tested (i.e., MD, PSD, or SNR-AUC). CONCLUSIONS: The SNR-AUC of mfVEP showed a high reproducibility in control group, whereas it fluctuated more in the POAG group according to the disease severity. MD in the control group and PSD in POAG group fluctuated among sessions during the 2-year period.
Entities:
Keywords:
Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; Multifocal visual evoked potential; Reproducibility; Signal-to-noise ratio; Test–retest variability
Authors: Brad Fortune; Shaban Demirel; Xian Zhang; Donald C Hood; Emily Patterson; Annisa Jamil; Steven L Mansberger; George A Cioffi; Chris A Johnson Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Candice S Chen; Donald C Hood; Xian Zhang; Emely Z Karam; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Robert Ritch; Phamornsak Thienprasiddhi; Vivienne C Greenstein Journal: J Glaucoma Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 2.503