Literature DB >> 21046369

Transcranial direct current stimulation affects visual perception measured by threshold perimetry.

Antje Kraft1, Jasper Roehmel, Manuel C Olma, Sein Schmidt, Kerstin Irlbacher, Stephan A Brandt.   

Abstract

In this study, we aimed to characterize the effect of anodal and cathodal direct current stimulation (tDCS) on contrast sensitivity inside the central 10 degrees of the visual field in healthy subjects. Distinct eccentricities were investigated separately, since at the cortical level, more central regions of the visual field are represented closer to the occipital pole, i.e. closer to the polarizing electrodes, than are the more peripheral regions. Using a double-blind and sham-controlled within-subject design, we measured the effect of stimulation and potential learning effect separately across testing days. Anodal stimulation of the visual cortex compared to sham stimulation yielded a significant increase in contrast sensitivity within 8° of the visual field. A significant increase in contrast sensitivity between the conditions "pre" and "post" anodal stimulation was only obtained for the central positions at eccentricities smaller than 2°. Cathodal stimulation of the visual cortex did not affect contrast sensitivity at either eccentricity. Perceptual learning across testing days was only observed for threshold perimetry before stimulation. Measuring contrast sensitivity changes after tDCS with a standard clinical tool such as threshold perimetry may provide an interesting perspective in assessing therapeutic effects of tDCS in ophthalmological or neurological defects (e.g. with foveal sparing vs. foveal splitting).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21046369     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-010-2453-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  28 in total

1.  The effect of perimetric experience in normal subjects.

Authors:  A Heijl; G Lindgren; J Olsson
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1989-01

Review 2.  Transcranial direct current stimulation and the visual cortex.

Authors:  Andrea Antal; Michael A Nitsche; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  2005-11-02       Impact factor: 4.077

3.  Visual evoked potentials modulation during direct current cortical polarization.

Authors:  Neri Accornero; Pietro Li Voti; Maurizio La Riccia; Bruno Gregori
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Towards unravelling task-related modulations of neuroplastic changes induced in the human motor cortex.

Authors:  Andrea Antal; Daniella Terney; Csaba Poreisz; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2007-10-26       Impact factor: 3.386

5.  Enhancement of planning ability by transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Colleen A Dockery; Ruth Hueckel-Weng; Niels Birbaumer; Christian Plewnia
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Specificity of fast perceptual learning in shape localisation tasks based on detection versus form discrimination.

Authors:  Antje Kraft; Cathleen Grimsen; Dennis Trenner; Stefanie Kehrer; Anika Lipfert; Martin Köhnlein; Manfred Fahle; Stephan A Brandt
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  A clinical comparison of visual field testing with a new automated perimeter, the Humphrey Field Analyzer, and the Goldmann perimeter.

Authors:  R W Beck; T J Bergstrom; P R Lichter
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans.

Authors:  M A Nitsche; W Paulus
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2001-11-27       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  Learning effect of Humphrey Matrix perimetry.

Authors:  Samin Hong; Kyungdoo Na; Chan Yun Kim; Gong Je Seong
Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.882

10.  Is there evidence for continued learning over multiple years in perimetry?

Authors:  Stuart K Gardiner; Shaban Demirel; Chris A Johnson
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.973

View more
  35 in total

1.  Excitability changes induced in the human auditory cortex by transcranial direct current stimulation: direct electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Tino Zaehle; Manuela Beretta; Lutz Jäncke; Christoph S Herrmann; Pascale Sandmann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  tDCS polarity effects in motor and cognitive domains: a meta-analytical review.

Authors:  Liron Jacobson; Meni Koslowsky; Michal Lavidor
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Behavioural and neurofunctional impact of transcranial direct current stimulation on somatosensory learning.

Authors:  Raphael Hilgenstock; Thomas Weiss; Ralph Huonker; Otto W Witte
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Transcranial direct-current stimulation modulates offline visual oscillatory activity: A magnetoencephalography study.

Authors:  Elizabeth Heinrichs-Graham; Timothy J McDermott; Mackenzie S Mills; Nathan M Coolidge; Tony W Wilson
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 4.027

5.  Transcranial direct current stimulation can selectively affect different processing channels in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Thiago L Costa; Russell D Hamer; Balázs V Nagy; Mirella T S Barboni; Mirella Gualtieri; Paulo S Boggio; Dora F Ventura
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Contrasting effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on central and peripheral visual fields.

Authors:  Thiago L Costa; Mirella Gualtieri; Mirella T S Barboni; Rafael K Katayama; Paulo S Boggio; Dora F Ventura
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  tDCS Modulates Visual Gamma Oscillations and Basal Alpha Activity in Occipital Cortices: Evidence from MEG.

Authors:  Tony W Wilson; Timothy J McDermott; Mackenzie S Mills; Nathan M Coolidge; Elizabeth Heinrichs-Graham
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Cortical excitability controls the strength of mental imagery.

Authors:  Rebecca Keogh; Johanna Bergmann; Joel Pearson
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Sensory and cognitive plasticity: implications for academic interventions.

Authors:  Emily A Cooper; Allyson P Mackey
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2016-08

Review 10.  [Transcranial direct current stimulation for depressive disorders].

Authors:  S Aust; U Palm; F Padberg; M Bajbouj
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.214

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.