Literature DB >> 18978277

Femoral neck fracture following hip resurfacing: the effect of alignment of the femoral component.

E T Davis1, M Olsen, R Zdero, J P Waddell, E H Schemitsch.   

Abstract

A total of 20 pairs of fresh-frozen cadaver femurs were assigned to four alignment groups consisting of relative varus (10 degrees and 20 degrees) and relative valgus (10 degrees and 20 degrees), 75 composite femurs of two neck geometries were also used. In both the cadaver and the composite femurs, placing the component in 20 degrees of valgus resulted in a significant increase in load to failure. Placing the component in 10 degrees of valgus had no appreciable effect on increasing the load to failure except in the composite femurs with varus native femoral necks. Specimens in 10 degrees of varus were significantly weaker than the neutrally-aligned specimens. The results suggest that retention of the intact proximal femoral strength occurs at an implant angulation of > or = 142 degrees . However, the benefit of extreme valgus alignment may be outweighed in clinical practice by the risk of superior femoral neck notching, which was avoided in this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18978277     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B11.20068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  18 in total

1.  Bone mineral density of the proximal femur recovers after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Matteo Cadossi; Antonio Moroni; Matteo Romagnoli; Eugenio Chiarello; Cesare Faldini; Sandro Giannini
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2010-05

2.  Hip resurfacing revision rates: radiological audit of risk factors.

Authors:  N Ramisetty; K M Krishnan; P F Partington
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  A simple technique for alignment in total hip resurfacing arthroplasty: technical note and preliminary report.

Authors:  Manuel Villanueva-Martínez; Antonio Ríos-Luna; Angel Villamor-Pérez
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2009-06-09

4.  Two-year migration results of the ReCap hip resurfacing system-a radiostereometric follow-up study of 23 hips.

Authors:  Thomas Baad-Hansen; Stig Storgaard Jakobsen; Kjeld Soballe
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-02-27       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  [Periprosthetic intertrochanteric fracture of the femur following articular resurfacing of the hip joint: treatment with lag screw osteosynthesis].

Authors:  T Lein; J Schlee; M Kothe; F Moritz; D T Wubtaye
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  The biomechanical analysis of three plating fixation systems for periprosthetic femoral fracture near the tip of a total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  James P Lever; Rad Zdero; Markku T Nousiainen; James P Waddell; Emil H Schemitsch
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 2.359

7.  Metal-on-metal hip resurfacings--a radiological perspective.

Authors:  Zhongbo Chen; Hemant Pandit; Adrian Taylor; Harinderjit Gill; David Murray; Simon Ostlere
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  The First SICOT Oral Presentation Award 2011: imageless computer-assisted femoral component positioning in hip resurfacing: a prospective randomised trial.

Authors:  Maik Stiehler; Jens Goronzy; Albrecht Hartmann; Frank Krummenauer; Klaus-Peter Günther
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Birmingham Mid-Head Resection Periprosthetic Fracture.

Authors:  Adeel Aqil; Hassaan Q Sheikh; Milad Masjedi; Jonathan Jeffers; Justin Cobb
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2015-08-13

10.  Resurfacing head size and femoral fracture: Are registry conclusions on head size justified?

Authors:  Adeel Aqil; Anatole Wiik; Susannah Clarke; Milad Masjedi; Justin Cobb
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-09-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.