Literature DB >> 26330966

Birmingham Mid-Head Resection Periprosthetic Fracture.

Adeel Aqil1, Hassaan Q Sheikh2, Milad Masjedi1, Jonathan Jeffers1, Justin Cobb1.   

Abstract

Total hip arthroplasty in the young leads to difficult choices in implant selection. Until recently bone conserving options were not available for younger patients with deficient femoral head bone stock. The novel Birmingham Mid-Head Resection (BMHR) device offers the option of bone conserving arthroplasty in spite of deficient femoral head bone stock. Femoral neck fracture is a known complication of standard resurfacing arthroplasty and is the most common reason for revision. It is unknown whether this remains to be the case for the BMHR neck preserving implants. We report a case of a 57-year-old male, who sustained a periprosthetic fracture following surgery with a BMHR arthroplasty. This paper illustrates the first reported case of a BMHR periprosthetic fracture. The fracture pattern is spiral in nature and reaches to the subtrochanteric area. This fracture pattern is different from published cadaveric studies, and clinicians using this implant should be aware of this as revision is likely to require a distally fitting, rather than a metaphyseal fitting stem. We have illustrated the surgical technique to manage this rare complication.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Birmingham Hip Resurfacing; Birmingham Mid-Head Resection; Fracture

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26330966      PMCID: PMC4553292          DOI: 10.4055/cios.2015.7.3.402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg        ISSN: 2005-291X


  7 in total

1.  A biomechanical investigation of implant alignment and femoral neck notching with the Birmingham Mid-Head Resection.

Authors:  Michael Olsen; Peter M Lewis; James P Waddell; Emil H Schemitsch
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  A clinicoradiologic study of the Birmingham Mid-Head Resection device.

Authors:  Joseph Daniel; Chandra Pradhan; Hena Ziaee; Derek J W McMinn
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.390

3.  Femoral neck fracture following hip resurfacing: the effect of alignment of the femoral component.

Authors:  E T Davis; M Olsen; R Zdero; J P Waddell; E H Schemitsch
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2008-11

4.  Femoral neck fractures following Birmingham hip resurfacing: a national review of 50 cases.

Authors:  A J Shimmin; D Back
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2005-04

5.  A biomechanical comparison of epiphyseal versus metaphyseal fixed bone-conserving hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michael Olsen; Michael Sellan; Rad Zdero; James P Waddell; Emil H Schemitsch
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Risk of periprosthetic femoral neck fracture after hip resurfacing arthroplasty: valgus compared with anatomic alignment. A biomechanical and clinical analysis.

Authors:  Corey J Richards; Demetri Giannitsios; Olga L Huk; David J Zukor; Thomas Steffen; John Antoniou
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Femoral neck fractures after metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  David R Marker; Thorsten M Seyler; Riyaz H Jinnah; Ronald E Delanois; Slif D Ulrich; Michael A Mont
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.757

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Cementless femoral neck endoprosthesis SPIRON in men in aspects of clinical status and quality of life in an average 7-year follow-up.

Authors:  Tomasz Stołtny; Bogdan Dugiełło; Michał Pyda; Jarosław Pasek; Dominika Rokicka; Marta Wróbel; Aleksander Augustyn; Daniel Spyrka; Michał Białek; Krzysztof Strojek; Bogdan Koczy
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 2.562

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.