Literature DB >> 20842366

Metal-on-metal hip resurfacings--a radiological perspective.

Zhongbo Chen1, Hemant Pandit, Adrian Taylor, Harinderjit Gill, David Murray, Simon Ostlere.   

Abstract

It is important to be aware of the various complications related to resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip (RSA) and the spectrum of findings that may be encountered on imaging. The bone conserving metal-on-metal (MOM) hip resurfacing has become increasingly popular over the last ten years, especially in young and active patients. Initial reports have been encouraging, but long-term outcome is still unknown. Early post operative complications are rare and have been well documented in the literature. Medium and long term complications are less well understood. A rare but important problem seen at this stage is the appearance of a cystic or solid periarticular reactive mass, which occurs predominately in women and usually affects both hips when seen in patients with bilateral RSAs. The following imaging findings are illustrated and their significance discussed; Uncomplicated hip resurfacing arthroplasty, radiolucency around the femoral peg, femoral neck fracture, loosening and infection, suboptimal component position, femoral notching, dislocation, heterotopic ossification, femoral neck thinning and reactive masses. The radiologist should be aware of the normal radiographic appearances and the variety of complications that may occur following RSA and should recommend ultrasound or MRI in patients with an unexplained symptomatic hip and normal radiographs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20842366     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-010-1946-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  19 in total

1.  Fracture of the stem of the femoral component after resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip.

Authors:  N K Bowman; T A Bucher; A A Bassily
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2006-12

2.  Incidence of heterotopic ossification after hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Diane L Back; Jay D Smith; Rodney E Dalziel; David A Young; Andrew Shimmin
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.872

3.  Hip resurfacings revised for inflammatory pseudotumour have a poor outcome.

Authors:  G Grammatopoulos; G Grammatopolous; H Pandit; Y-M Kwon; R Gundle; P McLardy-Smith; D J Beard; D W Murray; H S Gill
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2009-08

4.  Inflammatory pseudotumor associated with femoral nerve palsy following metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip. A case report.

Authors:  Robert A E Clayton; Ian Beggs; Donald M Salter; M Helen Grant; James T Patton; Daniel E Porter
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Revision of metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: the influence of malpositioning of the components.

Authors:  R De Haan; P A Campbell; E P Su; K A De Smet
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2008-09

6.  The five-year results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty: an independent series.

Authors:  R T Steffen; H P Pandit; J Palan; D J Beard; R Gundle; P McLardy-Smith; D W Murray; H S Gill
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2008-04

7.  The imaging spectrum of peri-articular inflammatory masses following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Christopher S J Fang; Paul Harvie; Christopher L M H Gibbons; Duncan Whitwell; Nicholas A Athanasou; Simon Ostlere
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings.

Authors:  H Pandit; S Glyn-Jones; P McLardy-Smith; R Gundle; D Whitwell; C L M Gibbons; S Ostlere; N Athanasou; H S Gill; D W Murray
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2008-07

9.  Initial American experience with hip resurfacing following FDA approval.

Authors:  Craig J Della Valle; Ryan M Nunley; Stephen J Raterman; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Femoral neck fractures after hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Robert-Tobias Steffen; Pedro R Foguet; Stephen J Krikler; Roger Gundle; David J Beard; David W Murray
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 4.757

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  The role of ultrasound in the assessment of post-operative complications following hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  H Douis; D J Dunlop; A M Pearson; J N O'Hara; S L J James
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-03-17       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Comparison of radiographs, tomosynthesis and CT with metal artifact reduction for the detection of hip prosthetic loosening.

Authors:  Romain Gillet; Pedro Teixeira; Chloé Bonarelli; Henry Coudane; François Sirveaux; Mathias Louis; Alain Blum
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Kinematic radiography of the hip joint after hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hiroki Kawashima; Yoshitomo Kajino; Tamon Kabata; Hiroyuki Tsuchiya; Shigeru Sanada; Katsuhiro Ichikawa
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2016-05-20

4.  A MRI classification of periprosthetic soft tissue masses (pseudotumours) associated with metal-on-metal resurfacing hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jennifer Hauptfleisch; Hemant Pandit; George Grammatopoulos; Harinderjit S Gill; David W Murray; Simon Ostlere
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-12-11       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Ultrasound-based decision making following metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Remo Goderecci; Andrea Fidanza; Stefano Necozione; Vincenzo Francione; Pier Francesco Indelli; Vittorio Calvisi
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-04-16

6.  Metal wear-induced pseudotumour following an endoprosthetic knee replacement for Ewing sarcoma.

Authors:  Richard Craig; Marianna Vlychou; Catherine L McCarthy; Christopher L M H Gibbons; N A Athanasou
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Is there a relation between clinical scores and serum ion levels after MoM-THA? One year results in 383 implants.

Authors:  Francesco Pogliacomi; Paolo Schiavi; Filippo Calderazzi; Massimiliano Leigheb; Marco Domenichini; Alessio Pedrazzini; Francesco Ceccarelli; Enrico Vaienti
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2020-12-30

Review 8.  Imaging in Hip Arthroplasty Management Part 2: Postoperative Diagnostic Imaging Strategy.

Authors:  Charles Lombard; Pierre Gillet; Edouard Germain; Fatma Boubaker; Alain Blum; Pedro Augusto Gondim Teixeira; Romain Gillet
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 4.964

9.  What is appropriate surveillance for metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty patients?

Authors:  Gulraj S Matharu; Andrew Judge; Antti Eskelinen; David W Murray; Hemant G Pandit
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 3.717

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.