Literature DB >> 19506966

A simple technique for alignment in total hip resurfacing arthroplasty: technical note and preliminary report.

Manuel Villanueva-Martínez1, Antonio Ríos-Luna, Angel Villamor-Pérez.   

Abstract

The functioning and survival of hip resurfacing arthroplasty depends on correct positioning and alignment of the implant. Correct positioning of the femoral alignment wire with respect to the femoral neck is the key to avoiding complications. Although the surgeon must align the wire in two planes, we can only control one plane at a time without changing position or relying on the indications of an assistant. Independent placement of two parallel alignment wires, one for varus-valgus orientation and another for version orientation, will help to determine two planes, the valgus sagittal plane and the version coronal plane, at the intersection of which both the optimum point of entry into the femoral head and the orientation line of the femoral alignment wire can be established. The marks on the neck and head and Kirschner wires following these marks define the planes. This simple technique allows us to reduce surgery time, minimize errors, and speed up the learning curve. It can be used with any type of resurfacing arthroplasty.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 19506966      PMCID: PMC2744755          DOI: 10.1007/s11420-009-9117-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HSS J        ISSN: 1556-3316


  21 in total

1.  Improved implantation technique for resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip.

Authors:  Carl Joachim Wirth; Frank Gossé
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.154

2.  Surgical variables affect the mechanics of a hip resurfacing system.

Authors:  Jason P Long; Donald L Bartel
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Navigation reduces the learning curve in resurfacing total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Justin P Cobb; Vijaraj Kannan; Klaus Brust; Gow Thevendran
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Computer-assisted placement technique in hip resurfacing arthroplasty: improvement in accuracy?

Authors:  S Krüger; P Y Zambelli; P-F Leyvraz; B M Jolles
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Intraoperative navigation in hip surface arthroplasty: a radiographic comparative analysis study.

Authors:  Radek Hart; Pavel Sváb; Peter Filan
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 3.067

6.  Does computer-assisted surgery improve accuracy and decrease the learning curve in hip resurfacing? A radiographic analysis.

Authors:  Thorsten M Seyler; Lawrence P Lai; Denise I Sprinkle; William G Ward; Riyaz H Jinnah
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Role of surgical position on interface stress and initial bone remodeling stimulus around hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kevin L Ong; Judd S Day; Steven M Kurtz; Richard E Field; Michael T Manley
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-09-26       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Revision of metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: the influence of malpositioning of the components.

Authors:  R De Haan; P A Campbell; E P Su; K A De Smet
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2008-09

9.  Mini-incision resurfacing arthroplasty of hip through the posterior approach.

Authors:  Derek J W McMinn; Joseph Daniel; Paul B Pynsent; Chandra Pradhan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Femoral component positioning in hip resurfacing with and without navigation.

Authors:  Muthu Ganapathi; Pascal-André Vendittoli; Martin Lavigne; Klaus-Peter Günther
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-05-17       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.