Literature DB >> 18958407

Return to work after injury: a review of evidence regarding expectations and injury perceptions, and their influence on outcome.

Joanna Fadyl1, Kathryn McPherson.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Work disability after injury is a complex problem, and there remains a lack of clarity about what factors are most influential on whether or not someone will experience difficulty returning to work. Increasingly, expectations and injury perceptions are being explored as potential factors in work disability, because of their role in influencing behaviours.
METHODS: This paper reviewed the literature regarding how expectations (regarding injury recovery and return to work) and injury perceptions relate to return to work outcome. A wide range of electronic journal databases were searched, and identified articles were critically appraised to assess quality and relevance. Results were then synthesised and discussed in relation to the evidence available regarding the role of expectations and injury perceptions in return to work, and implications for practice and further research.
RESULTS: Findings showed that evidence regarding to how both expectations and injury perceptions contribute to return to work outcome is limited. Some suggestions for application to practice are made. Methodological issues and key points to consider for future research are discussed.
CONCLUSIONS: While in general little is known about how much expectations and injury perceptions influence return to work outcome, it is clear that the issue requires further investigation. Key limits to current knowledge result from inadequate methods of measuring expectation/s, lack of clear definitions of 'return to work outcome' and differences in timeframes and populations. Never-the-less, there is promising evidence to suggest that, in particular, pain catastrophizing research is warranted due to its correlation with outcome and amenability to change.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18958407     DOI: 10.1007/s10926-008-9153-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Rehabil        ISSN: 1053-0487


  40 in total

1.  Early prognostic factors for duration on temporary total benefits in the first year among workers with compensated occupational soft tissue injuries.

Authors:  S Hogg-Johnson; D C Cole
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Biopsychosocial multivariate predictive model of occupational low back disability.

Authors:  Izabela Z Schultz; Joan M Crook; Jonathan Berkowitz; Gregory R Meloche; Ruth Milner; Oonagh A Zuberbier; Wendy Meloche
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Adjustment to chronic low back pain--the relative influence of fear-avoidance beliefs, catastrophizing, and appraisals of control.

Authors:  Steve R Woby; Paul J Watson; Neil K Roach; Martin Urmston
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2004-07

4.  Secondary prevention of work disability: community-based psychosocial intervention for musculoskeletal disorders.

Authors:  Michael J L Sullivan; L Charles Ward; Dean Tripp; Douglas J French; Heather Adams; William D Stanish
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2005-09

5.  Work-related recovery expectations and the prognosis of chronic low back pain within a workers' compensation setting.

Authors:  Douglas P Gross; Michele C Battié
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.162

6.  Motivating disability pensioners with back pain to return to work--a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Liv Magnussen; Liv Inger Strand; Jan Sture Skouen; Hege R Eriksen
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Fear of movement/(re)injury in chronic low back pain and its relation to behavioral performance.

Authors:  Johan W S Vlaeyen; Ank M J Kole-Snijders; Ruben G B Boeren; H van Eek
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 6.961

8.  Identifying psychosocial variables in patients with acute work-related low back pain: the importance of fear-avoidance beliefs.

Authors:  Julie M Fritz; Steven Z George
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2002-10

9.  Predicting outcome of chronic back pain using clinical predictors of psychopathology: a prospective analysis.

Authors:  R J Gatchel; P B Polatin; R K Kinney
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 4.267

Review 10.  Return-to-work outcomes following work disability: stakeholder motivations, interests and concerns.

Authors:  Amanda E Young; Radoslaw Wasiak; Richard T Roessler; Kathryn M McPherson; J R Anema; Mireille N M van Poppel
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2005-12
View more
  26 in total

1.  The effect of recalled previous work environment on return to work after a rehabilitation program including vocational aspects for trauma patients.

Authors:  Pierluigi Ballabeni; Cyrille Burrus; François Luthi; Charles Gobelet; Olivier Dériaz
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2011-03

2.  Individual recovery expectations and prognosis of outcomes in non-specific low back pain: prognostic factor review.

Authors:  Jill A Hayden; Maria N Wilson; Richard D Riley; Ross Iles; Tamar Pincus; Rachel Ogilvie
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-11-25

3.  Differences Over Time in the Prognostic Effect of Return to Work Self-Efficacy on a Sustained Return to Work.

Authors:  Oliver Black; Malcolm R Sim; Alexander Collie; Peter Smith
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2019-09

4.  Predicting Return to Work in a Heterogeneous Sample of Recently Injured Workers Using the Brief ÖMPSQ-SF.

Authors:  M K Nicholas; D S J Costa; S J Linton; C J Main; W S Shaw; R Pearce; M Gleeson; R Z Pinto; F M Blyth; J H McCauley; C G Maher; R J E M Smeets; A McGarity
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2019-06

5.  The impact of psychological symptoms on return to work in workers after occupational injury.

Authors:  Kuan-Han Lin; Nai-Wen Guo; Shu-Chu Shiao; Shih-Cheng Liao; Pei-Yi Hu; Jin-Huei Hsu; Yaw-Huei Hwang; Yue Leon Guo
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2013-03

6.  Clients' and RTW experts' view on the utility of FCE for the assessment of physical work ability, prognosis for work participation and advice on return to work.

Authors:  L W Pas; P P F M Kuijer; H Wind; J K Sluiter; J W Groothoff; S Brouwer; M H W Frings-Dresen
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 3.015

7.  Vocational rehabilitation program evaluation: comparison group challenges and the role of unmeasured return-to-work expectations.

Authors:  Jeanne M Sears; Lisann R Rolle; Beryl A Schulman; Thomas M Wickizer
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2014-12

8.  What is return to work? An investigation into the quantification of return to work.

Authors:  Adam P Vogel; Samantha J Barker; Amanda E Young; Rasa Ruseckaite; Alex Collie
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 3.015

9.  Work and Health Questionnaire (WHQ): A Screening Tool for Identifying Injured Workers at Risk for a Complicated Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Sandra Abegglen; Ulrike Hoffmann-Richter; Volker Schade; Hans-Jörg Znoj
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2017-06

Review 10.  Illness perceptions and work participation: a systematic review.

Authors:  J L Hoving; M van der Meer; A Y Volkova; M H W Frings-Dresen
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 3.015

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.