Literature DB >> 7498112

Predicting outcome of chronic back pain using clinical predictors of psychopathology: a prospective analysis.

R J Gatchel1, P B Polatin, R K Kinney.   

Abstract

This study evaluated whether a comprehensive assessment of psychosocial measures is useful in characterizing those acute low back pain patients who subsequently develop chronic pain disability problems. A cohort of 324 patients was evaluated, with all patients being administered a standard battery psychological assessment tests. A structured telephone interview was conducted 6 months after the psychological assessment to evaluate return-to-work status. Analyses, conducted to differentiate between those patients who were back at work at 6 months versus those who were not because of the original back injury, revealed the importance of 3 measures: self-reported pain and disability, the presence of a personality disorder, and scores on Scale 3 of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. These results demonstrate the presence of a psychosocial disability variable that is associated with those injured workers who are likely to develop chronic disability problems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7498112     DOI: 10.1037//0278-6133.14.5.415

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Psychol        ISSN: 0278-6133            Impact factor:   4.267


  38 in total

1.  Prognostic factors and treatment-related changes associated with return to work in the multimodal treatment of chronic back pain.

Authors:  A A Vendrig
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1999-06

Review 2.  Psychosocial factors and functional capacity evaluation among persons with chronic pain.

Authors:  Michael E Geisser; Michael E Robinson; Quaintance L Miller; Suzanne M Bade
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2003-12

3.  Borderline personality: a primary care context.

Authors:  Randy A Sansone; Lori A Sansone
Journal:  Psychiatry (Edgmont)       Date:  2004-09

4.  Can we identify people at risk of non-recovery after acute occupational low back pain? Results of a review and higher-order analysis.

Authors:  Adrienne Agnello; Tim Brown; Sam Desroches; Uma Welling; Dave Walton
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 1.037

5.  Predicting return to work after low back injury using the Psychosocial Risk for Occupational Disability Instrument: a validation study.

Authors:  I Z Schultz; J Crook; J Berkowitz; R Milner; G R Meloche
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2005-09

6.  Utility of the NEO-FFI in multi-dimensional assessment of orofacial pain conditions.

Authors:  John E Schmidt; W Michael Hooten; Charles R Carlson
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2010-10-02

Review 7.  Prognostic factors for duration of sick leave in patients sick listed with acute low back pain: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  I A Steenstra; J H Verbeek; M W Heymans; P M Bongers
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.402

8.  Screening for mental disorders in cancer, cardiovascular and musculoskeletal diseases. Comparison of HADS and GHQ-12.

Authors:  Martin Härter; Sonja Woll; Alexandra Wunsch; Jürgen Bengel; Katrin Reuter
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2006-01-01       Impact factor: 4.328

9.  DSM-IV-TR "pain disorder associated with psychological factors" as a nonhysterical form of somatization.

Authors:  Massimiliano Aragona; Lorenzo Tarsitani; Serena De Nitto; Maurizio Inghilleri
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.037

Review 10.  Return to work after injury: a review of evidence regarding expectations and injury perceptions, and their influence on outcome.

Authors:  Joanna Fadyl; Kathryn McPherson
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2008-10-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.