Literature DB >> 30719610

Differences Over Time in the Prognostic Effect of Return to Work Self-Efficacy on a Sustained Return to Work.

Oliver Black1,2, Malcolm R Sim3, Alexander Collie4, Peter Smith3,5,6.   

Abstract

Purpose This study investigated the association between return to work self-efficacy (RTW-SE) and sustained return to work (RTW) at two different time points, over a 12-month period. The primary objective of the study was to examine if the relationship between RTW-SE and a sustained RTW changed over the RTW timeline. Methods This study used survey responses from a longitudinal cohort of n = 410 workers' compensation claimants with either an upper-body musculoskeletal injury or a psychological injury. A path analysis tested the associations between RTW-SE and a sustained RTW at two time-points. A Wald χ2 test compared nested models to determine if the association changed over time. Results RTW-SE measured at time- point 1 (T1) was associated with a sustained RTW at time-point two (T2) (β = 0.24, P < 0.05) but no association was found between RTW-SE at T2 and a sustained RTW at time-point three (T3) (β = 0.017, n.s.). Model comparisons revealed significant differences in the associations between RTW-SE and a sustained RTW, with the relationship being stronger in the early phase of RTW compared to the latter phase (χ2 = 5.002, p = 0.03). Conclusions The results indicate that RTW-SE at 4-6 months post-injury is important for a sustained RTW 6-months later although RTW-SE at 10-12 months post-injury had a negligible association over the same duration. Further research should investigate whether these findings generalize to other populations and what factors other than RTW-SE are associated with RTW in the later stages of the RTW process.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Occupational injuries; Return to work; Self efficacy; Workers’ compensation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30719610     DOI: 10.1007/s10926-018-09824-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Rehabil        ISSN: 1053-0487


  22 in total

1.  Physical workplace factors and return to work after compensated low back injury: a disability phase-specific analysis.

Authors:  L K Dasinger; N Krause; L J Deegan; R J Brand; L Rudolph
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.162

2.  Differences in predictors of return to work among long-term sick-listed employees with different self-reported reasons for sick leave.

Authors:  Jenny J J M Huijs; Lando L J Koppes; Toon W Taris; Roland W B Blonk
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2012-09

Review 3.  Return to work after injury: a review of evidence regarding expectations and injury perceptions, and their influence on outcome.

Authors:  Joanna Fadyl; Kathryn McPherson
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2008-10-29

4.  Injured workers' construction of expectations of return to work with sub-acute back pain: the role of perceived uncertainty.

Authors:  Alison M Stewart; Emily Polak; Richard Young; Izabela Z Schultz
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2012-03

5.  Biopsychosocial predictors of prognosis in musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review of the literature (corrected and republished) *.

Authors:  François Laisné; Conrad Lecomte; Marc Corbière
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 3.033

6.  Return to work perceptions and actual return to work in workers with common mental disorders.

Authors:  Karen Nieuwenhuijsen; Erik Noordik; Frank J H van Dijk; Jac J van der Klink
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2013-06

7.  Prognostic factors for time receiving workers' compensation benefits in a cohort of patients with low back pain.

Authors:  G McIntosh; J Frank; S Hogg-Johnson; C Bombardier; H Hall
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Psychosocial job factors and return-to-work after compensated low back injury: a disability phase-specific analysis.

Authors:  N Krause; L K Dasinger; L J Deegan; L Rudolph; R J Brand
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.214

9.  Return-to-work self-efficacy: development and validation of a scale in claimants with musculoskeletal disorders.

Authors:  Sandra Brouwer; Renée-Louise Franche; Sheilah Hogg-Johnson; Hyunmi Lee; Niklas Krause; William S Shaw
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2011-06

10.  A prospective study of return to work across health conditions: perceived work attitude, self-efficacy and perceived social support.

Authors:  Sandra Brouwer; Michiel F Reneman; Ute Bültmann; Jac J L van der Klink; Johan W Groothoff
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2010-03
View more
  3 in total

1.  Individualised placement and support programme for people unemployed because of chronic pain: a feasibility study and the InSTEP pilot RCT.

Authors:  Cathy Linaker; Simon Fraser; Cathy Price; Nick Maguire; Paul Little; Ira Madan; Rafael Pinedo-Villanueva; David Coggon; Cyrus Cooper; Georgia Ntani; Karen Walker-Bone
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 4.014

2.  Assessing the psychometric properties of the Chinese return-to-work self-efficacy questionnaire using Rasch model analysis.

Authors:  Feng Liu; Zhenxiang Zhang; Beilei Lin; Zhiguang Ping; Yongxia Mei
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 3.186

3.  A pilot trial investigating the feasibility of a future randomised controlled trial of Individualised Placement and Support for people unemployed with chronic pain recruiting in primary care.

Authors:  Karen Walker-Bone; Simon Ds Fraser; Cathy Price; Nick Maguire; Cyrus Cooper; Ira Madan; Georgia Ntani; Cathy L Linaker
Journal:  Prim Health Care Res Dev       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 1.792

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.