Literature DB >> 27393558

Work and Health Questionnaire (WHQ): A Screening Tool for Identifying Injured Workers at Risk for a Complicated Rehabilitation.

Sandra Abegglen1, Ulrike Hoffmann-Richter2, Volker Schade2, Hans-Jörg Znoj2.   

Abstract

Purpose Unintentional injuries occur frequently and many of the accident survivors suffer from temporary or permanent disabilities. Although most accident victims recover quickly, a significant fraction of them shows a complicated recovery process and accounts for the majority of disability costs. Thus, early identification of vulnerable persons may be beneficial for compensation schemes, government bodies, as well as for the worker themselves. Here we present the Work and Health Questionnaire (WHQ), a screening tool that is already implemented in the case management process of the Swiss Accident Insurance Fund (Suva). Moreover, we demonstrate its prognostic value for identifying workers at risk of a complicated recovery process. Methods A total of 1963 injured workers answered the WHQ within the first 3 months after their accident. All of them had minor to moderate accidental injuries; severely injured workers were excluded from the analyses. The anonymized individual-level data were extracted from insurance databases. We examined construct validity by factorial analyses, and prognostic validity by hierarchical multiple regression analyses on days of work disability. Further, we evaluated well-being and job satisfaction 18 months post-injury in a subsample of 192 injured workers (9.8 %) Results Factor analyses supported five underlying factors (Job Design, Work Support, Job Strain, Somatic Condition/Pain, and Anxiety/Worries). These subscales were moderately correlated, thus indicating that different subscales measured different aspects of work and health-related risk factors of injured workers. Item analysis and reliability analysis showed accurate psychometric properties. Each subscale was predictive at least for one of the evaluated outcomes 18 months post-injury. Conclusion The WHQ shows good psychometric qualities with high clinical utility to identify injured persons with multiple psychosocial risk factors. Thus, the questionnaire appears to be suitable for exploring different rehabilitation needs among minor to moderate injured workers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Factor analysis; Injury; Rehabilitation; Return to work (RTW); Screening

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27393558     DOI: 10.1007/s10926-016-9654-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Rehabil        ISSN: 1053-0487


  33 in total

1.  Supportive colleague, unsupportive supervisor: the role of provider-specific constellations of social support at work in the development of low back pain.

Authors:  Achim Elfering; Norbert K Semmer; Volker Schade; Sven Grund; Norbert Boos
Journal:  J Occup Health Psychol       Date:  2002-04

2.  A RATIONALE AND TEST FOR THE NUMBER OF FACTORS IN FACTOR ANALYSIS.

Authors:  J L HORN
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  1965-06       Impact factor: 2.500

3.  Length of disability and cost of work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the upper extremity.

Authors:  L Hashemi; B S Webster; E A Clancy; T K Courtney
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.162

4.  Economic and social implications of aging societies.

Authors:  Sarah Harper
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  The impact of psychological symptoms on return to work in workers after occupational injury.

Authors:  Kuan-Han Lin; Nai-Wen Guo; Shu-Chu Shiao; Shih-Cheng Liao; Pei-Yi Hu; Jin-Huei Hsu; Yaw-Huei Hwang; Yue Leon Guo
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2013-03

6.  Prospective analysis of factors associated with work reentry in patients with accident-related injuries.

Authors:  Corinna Lange; Markus Burgmer; Michael Braunheim; Gereon Heuft
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2007-03

7.  Summary health statistics for the U.S. population: National Health Interview Survey, 2012.

Authors:  Patricia F Adams; Whitney K Kirzinger; Michael Martinez
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 10       Date:  2013-12

8.  A study of factors influencing return to work after wrist or ankle fractures.

Authors:  Karen Seland; Nicola Cherry; Jeremy Beach
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.214

9.  Distribution and determinants of health and work status in a comprehensive population of injury patients.

Authors:  Willem Jan Meerding; Caspar W N Looman; Marie-Louise Essink-Bot; Hidde Toet; Saakje Mulder; Ed F van Beeck
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2004-01

Review 10.  What work means to people with work disability: a scoping review.

Authors:  S L Saunders; B Nedelec
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2014-03
View more
  3 in total

1.  Estimating the Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on Worker Productivity Using Self-Report, Electronic Health Record and Human Resource Data.

Authors:  David C Tabano; Melissa L Anderson; Debra P Ritzwoller; Arne Beck; Nikki Carroll; Paul A Fishman; David C Grossman
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.162

Review 2.  Multidimensional screening for predicting pain problems in adults: a systematic review of screening tools and validation studies.

Authors:  Elke Veirman; Dimitri M L Van Ryckeghem; Annick De Paepe; Olivia J Kirtley; Geert Crombez
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2019-09-11

3.  Well-Being at Work after Return to Work (RTW): A Systematic Review.

Authors:  José-María Figueredo; Cristina García-Ael; Andrea Gragnano; Gabriela Topa
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.