Literature DB >> 12461399

Biopsychosocial multivariate predictive model of occupational low back disability.

Izabela Z Schultz1, Joan M Crook, Jonathan Berkowitz, Gregory R Meloche, Ruth Milner, Oonagh A Zuberbier, Wendy Meloche.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: To establish outcome, 253 workers with subacute and chronic low back conditions were assessed with a comprehensive multimethod biopsychosocial protocol at baseline, 3 days after the initial examination, and 3 months later.
OBJECTIVE: To validate empirically a biopsychosocial model for prediction of occupational low back disability. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Costs of low back occupational disability continue to spiral despite stabilization of low back injury rates. An empirically based model to predict occupational disability in workers with low back injuries is required.
METHODS: Workers with subacute low back injuries (4-6 weeks after injury, n = 192) and those with chronic back pain (6-12 months after injury, n = 61) were the study participants. The biopsychosocial protocol included five groups of variables: 1) sociodemographic, 2) medical, 3) psychosocial, 4) pain behavior, and 5) workplace-related factors. Predictive validity was investigated through a 3-month follow-up assessment, at which time the return to work outcome was determined. Stepwise logistic regression models were developed to predict work status.
RESULTS: The final integrated model consisted of variables from a wide biopsychosocial spectrum: vitality, health transition, feeling that job is threatened due to injury, expectations of recovery, guarding behavior, perception of severity of disability, time to complete walk, and right leg typical sciatica.
CONCLUSIONS: The "winning" variables identified in the integrated model are dominated by cognitions, which are accompanied by disability behaviors. A cognitive-behavioral model with an adaptation-oriented rather than a pathology-oriented focus is favored for early intervention with high-risk workers since cognitions are amenable to change.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12461399     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200212010-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  30 in total

Review 1.  Psychosocial factors at work in relation to low back pain and consequences of low back pain; a systematic, critical review of prospective cohort studies.

Authors:  J Hartvigsen; S Lings; C Leboeuf-Yde; L Bakketeig
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Functional limitations and well-being in injured municipal workers: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Marion Gillen; Sarah A Jewell; Julia A Faucett; Edward Yelin
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2004-06

3.  Placebo response to manual therapy: something out of nothing?

Authors:  Joel E Bialosky; Mark D Bishop; Steven Z George; Michael E Robinson
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2011-02

Review 4.  [Patients with low back pain. Psychosocial work-related factors and return to work - a literature review].

Authors:  M Bethge
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Individual recovery expectations and prognosis of outcomes in non-specific low back pain: prognostic factor review.

Authors:  Jill A Hayden; Maria N Wilson; Richard D Riley; Ross Iles; Tamar Pincus; Rachel Ogilvie
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-11-25

6.  Predicting return to work after low back injury using the Psychosocial Risk for Occupational Disability Instrument: a validation study.

Authors:  I Z Schultz; J Crook; J Berkowitz; R Milner; G R Meloche
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2005-09

Review 7.  Prognostic factors for duration of sick leave in patients sick listed with acute low back pain: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  I A Steenstra; J H Verbeek; M W Heymans; P M Bongers
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 8.  Reducing sickness absence from work due to low back pain: how well do intervention strategies match modifiable risk factors?

Authors:  William S Shaw; Steven J Linton; Glenn Pransky
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2006-12

9.  Changes after multidisciplinary pain treatment in patient pain beliefs and coping are associated with concurrent changes in patient functioning.

Authors:  Mark P Jensen; Judith A Turner; Joan M Romano
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2007-01-23       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 10.  Return to work after injury: a review of evidence regarding expectations and injury perceptions, and their influence on outcome.

Authors:  Joanna Fadyl; Kathryn McPherson
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2008-10-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.