Literature DB >> 18953530

Is visual dominance modulated by the threat value of visual and auditory stimuli?

Stefaan Van Damme1, Geert Crombez, Charles Spence.   

Abstract

The simultaneous presentation of a visual and an auditory stimulus can lead to a decrease in people's ability to perceive or respond to the auditory stimulus. In this study, we investigate the effect that threat has upon this phenomenon, known as the Colavita visual dominance effect. Participants performed two blocks of trials containing 40% visual, 40% auditory, and 20% bimodal trials. The first block of trials was identical for all participants, while in the second block, either the visual stimulus (visual threat condition), auditory stimulus (auditory threat condition), or neither stimulus (control condition) was fear-conditioned using aversive electrocutaneous stimuli. We predicted that, when compared with the control condition, this visual dominance effect would increase in the visual threat condition and decrease in the auditory threat condition. This hypothesis was partially supported by the data. In particular, the results showed that the fear-conditioning of the visual stimulus significantly increased the visual dominance effect relative to the control condition. However, the fear-conditioning of the auditory stimulus did not reduce the visual dominance effect but instead increased it slightly. These findings are discussed in terms of the role that attention and arousal play in the dominance of vision over audition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18953530     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1608-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  22 in total

1.  Does imminent threat capture and hold attention?

Authors:  Ernst H W Koster; Geert Crombez; Stefaan Van Damme; Bruno Verschuere; Jan De Houwer
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2004-09

2.  Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: a meta-analytic study.

Authors:  Yair Bar-Haim; Dominique Lamy; Lee Pergamin; Marian J Bakermans-Kranenburg; Marinus H van IJzendoorn
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  The role of extinction and reinstatement in attentional bias to threat: a conditioning approach.

Authors:  Stefaan Van Damme; Geert Crombez; Dirk Hermans; Ernst H W Koster; Christopher Eccleston
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2005-12-22

4.  Visual dominance and attention: the Colavita effect revisited.

Authors:  Scott Sinnett; Charles Spence; Salvador Soto-Faraco
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2007-07

5.  A further investigation of visual dominance.

Authors:  F B Colavita; D Weisberg
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1979-04

Review 6.  Visual dominance: an information-processing account of its origins and significance.

Authors:  M I Posner; M J Nissen; R M Klein
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Effects of arousal on human visual dominance.

Authors:  K L Shapiro; B Egerman; R M Klein
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-06

8.  Seeing the light: exploring the Colavita visual dominance effect.

Authors:  Camille Koppen; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-02-27       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The co-occurrence of multisensory competition and facilitation.

Authors:  Scott Sinnett; Salvador Soto-Faraco; Charles Spence
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2008-01-22

10.  Fear-conditioned cues of impending pain facilitate attentional engagement.

Authors:  Stefaan Van Damme; Jürgen Lorenz; Christopher Eccleston; Ernst H W Koster; Armand De Clercq; Geert Crombez
Journal:  Neurophysiol Clin       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.734

View more
  7 in total

1.  Spatio-temporal measures of electrophysiological correlates for behavioral multisensory enhancement during visual, auditory and somatosensory stimulation: A behavioral and ERP study.

Authors:  Wuyi Wang; Li Hu; Hongyan Cui; Xiaobo Xie; Yong Hu
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 5.203

2.  Enhanced visual dominance in far space.

Authors:  Zhenzhu Yue; Yizhou Jiang; You Li; Pengfei Wang; Qi Chen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Dynamic characteristics of multisensory facilitation and inhibition.

Authors:  W Y Wang; L Hu; E Valentini; X B Xie; H Y Cui; Y Hu
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 5.082

4.  The arousing power of everyday materials: an analysis of the physiological and behavioral responses to visually and tactually presented textures.

Authors:  Roberta Etzi; Alberto Gallace
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Does visual information influence infants' movement to music?

Authors:  Gin Morgan; Cynthia M Killough; Laura A Thompson
Journal:  Psychol Music       Date:  2013-03

6.  Endogenous Spatial Attention Modulates the Magnitude of the Colavita Visual Dominance Effect.

Authors:  Aijun Wang; Heng Zhou; Yuanyuan Hu; Qiong Wu; Tianyang Zhang; Xiaoyu Tang; Ming Zhang
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2021-07-12

7.  Is bad news on TV tickers good news? The effects of voiceover and visual elements in video on viewers' assessment.

Authors:  Konrad Maj; Stephan Lewandowsky
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.