Literature DB >> 26080757

Enhanced visual dominance in far space.

Zhenzhu Yue1, Yizhou Jiang2, You Li2, Pengfei Wang2, Qi Chen3.   

Abstract

The Colavita effect refers to the phenomenon that people do not respond to an auditory stimulus in most cases when a visual stimulus is simultaneously presented. Although the Colavita effect remains robust irrespective of many factors, little is known concerning how the visual dominance varies as a function of the depth of sensory inputs. In the present study, visual and auditory stimuli were presented either in the same (in Experiment 1) or in the different spatial distances (in Experiment 2). Participants were asked to make speeded responses to unimodal auditory, unimodal visual, or bimodal audiovisual stimuli. In the incorrectly responded bimodal trials, the error trials in which responses were made only to the visual component were compared with the trials in which responses were made only to the auditory component. In the correctly responded bimodal trials, the trials in which participants responded first to the visual component were compared with the trials in which participants responded first to the auditory component. Analysis on the incorrect and correct bimodal trials both indicated significant visual dominance effects. More importantly, the size of the visual dominance effect was significantly enhanced as long as the visual stimuli were presented in far space irrespective of whether the auditory stimuli were presented in near or far space. Our results thus, for the first time, revealed that the visual dominance effect changed along the depth dimension of space. Taken together, the present results shed lights on how the allocation of attentional resources along the depth dimension of space biases the process of multisensory competition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Far space; Near space; The Colavita effect; Visual dominance

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26080757     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-015-4353-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  31 in total

1.  Sensory uncertainty governs the extent of audio-visual interaction.

Authors:  J Heron; D Whitaker; P V McGraw
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 2.  Why seeing is believing: merging auditory and visual worlds.

Authors:  Ilana B Witten; Eric I Knudsen
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-11-03       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Reversing the Colavita visual dominance effect.

Authors:  Mary Kim Ngo; Michelle L Cadieux; Scott Sinnett; Salvador Soto-Faraco; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-11       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The influence of stimulus duration on visual illusions and simple reaction time.

Authors:  Thorsten Plewan; Ralph Weidner; Gereon R Fink
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  A further investigation of visual dominance.

Authors:  F B Colavita; D Weisberg
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1979-04

Review 6.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.

Authors:  R Desimone; J Duncan
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 12.449

7.  Is visual dominance modulated by the threat value of visual and auditory stimuli?

Authors:  Stefaan Van Damme; Geert Crombez; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Changes in sensory dominance during childhood: converging evidence from the colavita effect and the sound-induced flash illusion.

Authors:  Elena Nava; Francesco Pavani
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2012-09-24

9.  Audiovisual asynchrony modulates the Colavita visual dominance effect.

Authors:  Camille Koppen; Charles Spence
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-05       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Semantic congruency and the Colavita visual dominance effect.

Authors:  Camille Koppen; Agnès Alsius; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-09-19       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  5 in total

1.  Top-down attention modulates the direction and magnitude of sensory dominance.

Authors:  Ying Fang; You Li; Xiaoting Xu; Hong Tao; Qi Chen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Sound-induced flash illusion is modulated by the depth of auditory stimuli: Evidence from younger and older adults.

Authors:  Yawen Sun; Heng Zhou; Chunmei Liu; Aijun Wang; Chunlin Yue; Ming Zhang
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 2.157

3.  Neurophysiological Correlates of Visual Dominance: A Lateralized Readiness Potential Investigation.

Authors:  You Li; Mingxin Liu; Wei Zhang; Sai Huang; Bao Zhang; Xingzhou Liu; Qi Chen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-03-02

4.  Hand preference for the visual and auditory modalities in humans.

Authors:  Yuqian Yang; Peter H Weiss; Gereon R Fink; Qi Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Endogenous Spatial Attention Modulates the Magnitude of the Colavita Visual Dominance Effect.

Authors:  Aijun Wang; Heng Zhou; Yuanyuan Hu; Qiong Wu; Tianyang Zhang; Xiaoyu Tang; Ming Zhang
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2021-07-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.