Literature DB >> 15456400

Does imminent threat capture and hold attention?

Ernst H W Koster1, Geert Crombez, Stefaan Van Damme, Bruno Verschuere, Jan De Houwer.   

Abstract

According to models of attention and emotion, threat captures and holds attention. In behavioral tasks, robust evidence has been found for attentional holding but not for attentional capture by threat. An important explanation for the absence of attentional capture effects is that the visual stimuli used posed no genuine threat. The present study investigated whether visual cues that signal an aversive white noise can elicit attentional capture and holding effects. Cues presented in an attentional task were simultaneously provided with a threat value through an aversive conditioning procedure. Response latencies showed that threatening cues captured and held attention. These results support recent views on attention to threat, proposing that imminent threat captures attention in everyone. (c) 2004 APA, all rights reserved

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15456400     DOI: 10.1037/1528-3542.4.3.312

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emotion        ISSN: 1528-3542


  60 in total

1.  Differential interference effects of negative emotional states on subsequent semantic and perceptual processing.

Authors:  Michiko Sakaki; Marissa A Gorlick; Mara Mather
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2011-12

2.  Exogenous attention to facial vs non-facial emotional visual stimuli.

Authors:  Luis Carretié; Dominique Kessel; Alejandra Carboni; Sara López-Martín; Jacobo Albert; Manuel Tapia; Francisco Mercado; Almudena Capilla; José A Hinojosa
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Measuring the emotion-specificity of rapid stimulus-driven attraction of attention to fearful faces: evidence from emotion categorization and a comparison with disgusted faces.

Authors:  Shah Khalid; Gernot Horstmann; Thomas Ditye; Ulrich Ansorge
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-01-21

4.  Age-Group Differences in Interference from Young and Older Emotional Faces.

Authors:  Natalie C Ebner; Marcia K Johnson
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2010-11-01

5.  Does contingency awareness mediate the influence of emotional learning on the cueing of visual attention?

Authors:  An K Raes; Rudi De Raedt; Wim Fias; Ernst H W Koster; Stefaan Van Damme
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-03-06

6.  Electrophysiological differences in the processing of affective information in words and pictures.

Authors:  José A Hinojosa; Luis Carretié; María A Valcárcel; Constantino Méndez-Bértolo; Miguel A Pozo
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Toward and away from spiders: eye-movements in spider-fearful participants.

Authors:  Antje B M Gerdes; Paul Pauli; Georg W Alpers
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 3.575

8.  The Diagnosticity of Color for Emotional Objects.

Authors:  Brenton W McMenamin; Jasmine Radue; Joanna Trask; Kristin Huskamp; Daniel Kersten; Chad J Marsolek
Journal:  Motiv Emot       Date:  2013-09-01

Review 9.  Mechanisms of attentional biases towards threat in anxiety disorders: An integrative review.

Authors:  Josh M Cisler; Ernst H W Koster
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2009-12-14

10.  Is visual dominance modulated by the threat value of visual and auditory stimuli?

Authors:  Stefaan Van Damme; Geert Crombez; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.