Literature DB >> 17929691

Visual dominance and attention: the Colavita effect revisited.

Scott Sinnett1, Charles Spence, Salvador Soto-Faraco.   

Abstract

Under many conditions, humans display a robust tendency to rely more on visual information than on other forms of sensory information. Colavita (1974) illustrated this visual dominance effect by showing that naive observers typically fail to respond to clearly suprathreshold tones if these are presented simultaneously with a visual target flash. In the present study, we demonstrate that visual dominance influences performance under more complex stimulation conditions and address the role played by attention in mediating this effect. In Experiment 1, we show the Colavita effect in the simple speeded detection of line drawings and naturalistic sounds, whereas in Experiment 2 we demonstrate visual dominance when the task targets (auditory, visual, or bimodal combinations) are embedded among continuous streams of irrelevant distractors. In Experiments 3-5, we address the consequences of varying the probability of occurrence of targets in each sensory modality. In Experiment 6, we further investigate the role played by attention on visual dominance by manipulating perceptual load in either the visual or the auditory modality. Our results demonstrate that selective attention to a particular sensory modality can modulate--although not completely reverse--visual dominance as illustrated by the Colavita effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17929691     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193770

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  39 in total

1.  Cross-modal perceptual load: the impact of modality and individual differences.

Authors:  Rajwant Sandhu; Benjamin James Dyson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Influence of auditory and audiovisual stimuli on the right-left prevalence effect.

Authors:  Kim-Phuong L Vu; Katsumi Minakata; Mary Kim Ngo
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-10-06

3.  Seismic signal dominance in the multimodal courtship display of the wolf spider Schizocosa stridulans Stratton 1991.

Authors:  Eileen A Hebets
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 2.671

4.  Switching attention between modalities: further evidence for visual dominance.

Authors:  Sarah Lukas; Andrea M Philipp; Iring Koch
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-06-11

5.  Reversing the Colavita visual dominance effect.

Authors:  Mary Kim Ngo; Michelle L Cadieux; Scott Sinnett; Salvador Soto-Faraco; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-11       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Emotional visual stimuli affect the evaluation of tactile stimuli presented on the arms but not the related electrodermal responses.

Authors:  Roberta Etzi; Massimiliano Zampini; Georgiana Juravle; Alberto Gallace
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Assessing the audiotactile Colavita effect in near and rear space.

Authors:  Valeria Occelli; Jess Hartcher O'Brien; Charles Spence; Massimiliano Zampini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Is visual dominance modulated by the threat value of visual and auditory stimuli?

Authors:  Stefaan Van Damme; Geert Crombez; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Sensory dominance in combinations of audio, visual and haptic stimuli.

Authors:  David Hecht; Miriam Reiner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Alcohol-related visual cues impede the ability to process auditory information: Seeing but not hearing.

Authors:  Ramey G Monem; Mark T Fillmore
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2015-12-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.