Literature DB >> 17333012

Seeing the light: exploring the Colavita visual dominance effect.

Camille Koppen1, Charles Spence.   

Abstract

The Colavita visual dominance effect refers to the phenomenon whereby participants presented with unimodal auditory, unimodal visual, or bimodal audiovisual stimuli in a speeded discrimination task, fail to respond to the auditory component of bimodal targets significantly more often than they fail to respond to the visual component. The Colavita effect was demonstrated in this study when participants were presented with unimodal auditory, unimodal visual, or bimodal stimuli (in the ratios 40:40:20, Experiment 1; or 33:33:33, Experiment 2), to which they had to respond by pressing an auditory response key, a visual response key, or both response keys. The Colavita effect was also demonstrated when participants had to respond to the bimodal targets using a dedicated third (bimodal) response key (Experiment 3). These results therefore suggest that stimulus probability and the response demands of the task do not contribute significantly to the Colavita effect. In Experiment 4, we investigated what role exogenous attention toward a sensory modality plays in the Colavita effect. A significantly larger Colavita effect was observed when a visual cue preceded the bimodal target than when an auditory cue preceded it. This result suggests that the Colavita visual dominance effect can be partially explained in terms of the greater exogenous attention-capturing qualities of visual versus auditory stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17333012     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-0894-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  39 in total

1.  Making two responses to a single object: implications for the central attentional bottleneck.

Authors:  C Fagot; H Pashler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Semantic congruence is a critical factor in multisensory behavioral performance.

Authors:  Paul J Laurienti; Robert A Kraft; Joseph A Maldjian; Jonathan H Burdette; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-06-18       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Sensory uncertainty governs the extent of audio-visual interaction.

Authors:  J Heron; D Whitaker; P V McGraw
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Hearing lips and seeing voices.

Authors:  H McGurk; J MacDonald
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1976 Dec 23-30       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Vision and touch.

Authors:  I Rock; C S Harris
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  1967-05       Impact factor: 2.142

6.  Attention and reaction times to signals of uncertain modality.

Authors:  L R Boulter
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1977-08       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  A further investigation of visual dominance.

Authors:  F B Colavita; D Weisberg
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1979-04

8.  Intersensory facilitation of reaction time: energy summation or preparation enhancement?

Authors:  R S Nickerson
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 9.  Visual dominance: an information-processing account of its origins and significance.

Authors:  M I Posner; M J Nissen; R M Klein
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Divided attention: evidence for coactivation with redundant signals.

Authors:  J Miller
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  23 in total

1.  Catch the moment: multisensory enhancement of rapid visual events by sound.

Authors:  Yi-Chuan Chen; Su-Ling Yeh
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Seismic signal dominance in the multimodal courtship display of the wolf spider Schizocosa stridulans Stratton 1991.

Authors:  Eileen A Hebets
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 2.671

3.  Reversing the Colavita visual dominance effect.

Authors:  Mary Kim Ngo; Michelle L Cadieux; Scott Sinnett; Salvador Soto-Faraco; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-11       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Assessing the audiotactile Colavita effect in near and rear space.

Authors:  Valeria Occelli; Jess Hartcher O'Brien; Charles Spence; Massimiliano Zampini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Top-down attention modulates the direction and magnitude of sensory dominance.

Authors:  Ying Fang; You Li; Xiaoting Xu; Hong Tao; Qi Chen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Preferential processing of tactile events under conditions of divided attention.

Authors:  James V M Hanson; David Whitaker; James Heron
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 1.837

7.  Is visual dominance modulated by the threat value of visual and auditory stimuli?

Authors:  Stefaan Van Damme; Geert Crombez; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Sensory dominance in combinations of audio, visual and haptic stimuli.

Authors:  David Hecht; Miriam Reiner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Semantic congruency and the Colavita visual dominance effect.

Authors:  Camille Koppen; Agnès Alsius; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-09-19       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  A signal detection study of the Colavita visual dominance effect.

Authors:  Camille Koppen; Carmel A Levitan; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.