Literature DB >> 18930155

Event-related brain potentials during the monitoring of speech errors.

Niels O Schiller1, Iemke Horemans, Lesya Ganushchak, Dirk Koester.   

Abstract

When we perceive speech, our goal is to extract the meaning of the verbal message which includes semantic processing. However, how deeply do we process speech in different situations? In two experiments, native Dutch participants heard spoken sentences describing simultaneously presented pictures. Sentences either correctly described the pictures or contained an anomalous final word (i.e. a semantically or phonologically incongruent word). In the first experiment, spoken sentences were task-irrelevant and both anomalous conditions elicited similar centro-parietal N400s that were larger in amplitude than the N400 for the correct condition. In the second experiment, we ensured that participants processed the same stimuli semantically. In an early time window, we found similar phonological mismatch negativities for both anomalous conditions compared to the correct condition. These negativities were followed by an N400 that was larger for semantic than phonological errors. Together, these data suggest that we process speech semantically, even if the speech is task-irrelevant. Once listeners allocate more cognitive resources to the processing of speech, we suggest that they make predictions for upcoming words, presumably by means of the production system and an internal monitoring loop, to facilitate lexical processing of the perceived speech.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18930155     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.09.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  10 in total

1.  Effects in production of word pre-activation during listening: are listener-generated predictions specified at a speech-sound level?

Authors:  Eleanor Drake; Martin Corley
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-01

2.  Incidence of speech recognition errors in the emergency department.

Authors:  Foster R Goss; Li Zhou; Scott G Weiner
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 4.046

3.  Articulatory imaging implicates prediction during spoken language comprehension.

Authors:  Eleanor Drake; Martin Corley
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-11

Review 4.  Pathophysiology of somatosensory abnormalities in Parkinson disease.

Authors:  Antonella Conte; Nashaba Khan; Giovanni Defazio; John C Rothwell; Alfredo Berardelli
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 42.937

5.  Phonological repetition-suppression in bilateral superior temporal sulci.

Authors:  Kenneth I Vaden; L Tugan Muftuler; Gregory Hickok
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Real-time processing in picture naming in adults who stutter: ERP evidence.

Authors:  Nathan D Maxfield; Kalie Morris; Stefan A Frisch; Kathryn Morphew; Joseph L Constantine
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  Conscious intention to speak proactively facilitates lexical access during overt object naming.

Authors:  Kristof Strijkers; Phillip J Holcomb; Albert Costa
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 3.059

8.  Phoneme-free prosodic representations are involved in pre-lexical and lexical neurobiological mechanisms underlying spoken word processing.

Authors:  Ulrike Schild; Angelika B C Becker; Claudia K Friedrich
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 2.381

9.  Early neurophysiological indices of second language morphosyntax learning.

Authors:  Jeff Hanna; Yury Shtyrov; John Williams; Friedemann Pulvermüller
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2016-01-02       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Prediction is Production: The missing link between language production and comprehension.

Authors:  Clara D Martin; Francesca M Branzi; Moshe Bar
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.