Literature DB >> 24039339

Conscious intention to speak proactively facilitates lexical access during overt object naming.

Kristof Strijkers1, Phillip J Holcomb, Albert Costa.   

Abstract

The present study explored when and how the top-down intention to speak influences the language production process. We did so by comparing the brain's electrical response for a variable known to affect lexical access, namely word frequency, during overt object naming and non-verbal object categorization. We found that during naming, the event-related brain potentials elicited for objects with low frequency names started to diverge from those with high frequency names as early as 152 ms after stimulus onset, while during non-verbal categorization the same frequency comparison appeared 200 ms later eliciting a qualitatively different brain response. Thus, only when participants had the conscious intention to name an object the brain rapidly engaged in lexical access. The data offer evidence that top-down intention to speak proactively facilitates the activation of words related to perceived objects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ERPs; Language production; Lexical access; Task intention; Top-down processing

Year:  2012        PMID: 24039339      PMCID: PMC3770451          DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2011.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mem Lang        ISSN: 0749-596X            Impact factor:   3.059


  118 in total

1.  What the eyes say about speaking.

Authors:  Z M Griffin; K Bock
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-07

2.  The specific-word frequency effect: implications for the representation of homophones in speech production.

Authors:  A Caramazza; A Costa; M Miozzo; Y Bi
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Locus of semantic interference in picture-word interference tasks.

Authors:  Markus F Damian; Jeffrey S Bowers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-03

4.  Top-down facilitation of visual recognition.

Authors:  M Bar; K S Kassam; A S Ghuman; J Boshyan; A M Schmid; A M Schmidt; A M Dale; M S Hämäläinen; K Marinkovic; D L Schacter; B R Rosen; E Halgren
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-01-03       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Activation of the posterior cingulate by semantic priming: a co-registered ERP/fMRI study.

Authors:  Aminda J O'Hare; Joseph Dien; Lauren D Waterson; Cary R Savage
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-11-12       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Morphological priming in overt language production: electrophysiological evidence from Dutch.

Authors:  Dirk Koester; Niels O Schiller
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-07-12       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Tracking lexical access in speech production: electrophysiological correlates of word frequency and cognate effects.

Authors:  Kristof Strijkers; Albert Costa; Guillaume Thierry
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 8.  Attentional networks.

Authors:  M I Posner; S Dehaene
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 13.837

9.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity.

Authors:  M Kutas; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-01-11       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Phonological processing of ignored distractor pictures, an fMRI investigation.

Authors:  Mart Bles; Bernadette M Jansma
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2008-02-11       Impact factor: 3.288

View more
  18 in total

1.  A funny thing happened on the way to articulation: N400 attenuation despite behavioral interference in picture naming.

Authors:  Trevor Blackford; Phillip J Holcomb; Jonathan Grainger; Gina R Kuperberg
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2012-01-14

2.  Semantic and Phonological Encoding Times in Adults Who Stutter: Brain Electrophysiological Evidence.

Authors:  Nathan D Maxfield
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Parallel object activation and attentional gating of information: evidence from eye movements in the multiple object naming paradigm.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter; Victor S Ferreira; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  The Domain-General Multiple Demand (MD) Network Does Not Support Core Aspects of Language Comprehension: A Large-Scale fMRI Investigation.

Authors:  Evgeniia Diachek; Idan Blank; Matthew Siegelman; Josef Affourtit; Evelina Fedorenko
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Riding the lexical speedway: a critical review on the time course of lexical selection in speech production.

Authors:  Kristof Strijkers; Albert Costa
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-12-02

6.  On the temporal and functional origin of l2 disadvantages in speech production: a critical review.

Authors:  Elin Runnqvist; Kristof Strijkers; Jasmin Sadat; Albert Costa
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-12-16

7.  Early goal-directed top-down influences in the production of speech.

Authors:  Kristof Strijkers; Yen Na Yum; Jonathan Grainger; Phillip J Holcomb
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-12-09

8.  Task-Relevant Representations and Cognitive Control Demands Modulate Functional Connectivity from Ventral Occipito-Temporal Cortex During Object Recognition Tasks.

Authors:  Francesca M Branzi; Clara D Martin; Pedro M Paz-Alonso
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 4.861

9.  When does word frequency influence written production?

Authors:  Cristina Baus; Kristof Strijkers; Albert Costa
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-12-24

10.  Early Parallel Activation of Semantics and Phonology in Picture Naming: Evidence from a Multiple Linear Regression MEG Study.

Authors:  Michele Miozzo; Friedemann Pulvermüller; Olaf Hauk
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 5.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.