Literature DB >> 26069202

Articulatory imaging implicates prediction during spoken language comprehension.

Eleanor Drake1, Martin Corley2.   

Abstract

It has been suggested that the activation of speech-motor areas during speech comprehension may, in part, reflect the involvement of the speech production system in synthesizing upcoming material at an articulatorily specified level. In this study, we explored that suggestion through the use of articulatory imaging. We investigated whether, and how, predictions that emerge during speech comprehension influence articulatory realizations during picture naming. We elicited predictions by auditorily presenting high-cloze sentence stems to participants (e.g., When we want water we just turn on the . . .). Participants named a picture immediately following each sentence-stem presentation. The pictures either matched (e.g., TAP) or mismatched (e.g., CAP) the high-cloze sentence-stem target. Throughout each trial, participants' speech-motor movements were recorded via dynamic ultrasound imaging. This allowed us to compare articulations in the match and mismatch conditions to each other and to a control condition (simple picture naming). Articulations in the mismatch condition differed more from the control condition than did those in the match condition. This difference was reflected in a second analysis that showed greater frame-by-frame change in articulator positions for the mismatch than for the match condition around 300-500 ms before the onset of the picture name. Our findings indicate that comprehension-elicited prediction influences speech-motor production, suggesting that the speech production system is implicated in the representation of such predictions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Language comprehension; Psycholinguistics; Speech production

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26069202     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-015-0530-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  45 in total

1.  The cerebellum and the timing of coordinated eye and hand tracking.

Authors:  R C Miall; G Z Reckess
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  DMDX: a windows display program with millisecond accuracy.

Authors:  Kenneth I Forster; Jonathan C Forster
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2003-02

3.  Listening to action-related sentences activates fronto-parietal motor circuits.

Authors:  Marco Tettamanti; Giovanni Buccino; Maria Cristina Saccuman; Vittorio Gallese; Massimo Danna; Paola Scifo; Ferruccio Fazio; Giacomo Rizzolatti; Stefano F Cappa; Daniela Perani
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity.

Authors:  Katherine A DeLong; Thomas P Urbach; Marta Kutas
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-07-10       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 5.  Neural evidence for the interplay between language, gesture, and action: a review.

Authors:  Roel M Willems; Peter Hagoort
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2007-04-09       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  Processing of natural images is feedforward: a simple behavioral test.

Authors:  Thomas Schmidt; Filipp Schmidt
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  The role of phonetic and orthographic similarity in picture-word interference.

Authors:  S J Lupker
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1982-09

Review 8.  A little more conversation, a little less action--candidate roles for the motor cortex in speech perception.

Authors:  Sophie K Scott; Carolyn McGettigan; Frank Eisner
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 34.870

9.  Talking as doing: Language forms and public language.

Authors:  Carol A Fowler
Journal:  New Ideas Psychol       Date:  2014-01-01

10.  Are phonological influences on lexical (mis)selection the result of a monitoring bias?

Authors:  Els Severens; Elie Ratinckx; Victor S Ferreira; Robert J Hartsuiker
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.143

View more
  4 in total

1.  Pause Postures: The relationship between articulation and cognitive processes during pauses.

Authors:  Jelena Krivokapić; Will Styler; Benjamin Parrell
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2020-02-21

2.  Listeners are better at predicting speakers similar to themselves.

Authors:  Lauren V Hadley; Nina K Fisher; Martin J Pickering
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2020-06-07

3.  Prediction is Production: The missing link between language production and comprehension.

Authors:  Clara D Martin; Francesca M Branzi; Moshe Bar
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Predicting One's Turn With Both Body and Mind: Anticipatory Speech Postures During Dyadic Conversation.

Authors:  Peter A Krause; Alan H Kawamoto
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-07-13
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.