Literature DB >> 19651222

Phonological repetition-suppression in bilateral superior temporal sulci.

Kenneth I Vaden1, L Tugan Muftuler, Gregory Hickok.   

Abstract

Evidence has accumulated that posterior superior temporal sulcus (STS) is critically involved in phonological processing during speech perception, although there are conflicting accounts regarding the degree of lateralization. The current fMRI experiment aimed to identify phonological processing during speech perception through repetition-suppression effects. Repetition-suppression occurs when brain activity decreases from repetitive presentation of stimulus characteristics, in regions of cortex that process those characteristics. We manipulated the degree of phonological repetition among words in short lists to obtain systematic decreases in brain response, indicative of phonological processing. The fMRI experiment presented seventeen participants with recorded wordlists, of low, medium, or high phonological repetition, defined by how many phonemes were shared among words. Bilaterally, middle STS demonstrated activity differences consistent with our prediction of repetition-suppression, as responses decreased systematically with each increase in phonological repetition. Phonological repetition-suppression in bilateral STS converges with neuroimaging evidence for phonological processing, and word deafness resulting from bilateral superior temporal lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19651222      PMCID: PMC2764799          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.07.063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  61 in total

1.  Conjunction revisited.

Authors:  Karl J Friston; William D Penny; Daniel E Glaser
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Processing of sub-syllabic speech units in the posterior temporal lobe: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Lars M Rimol; Karsten Specht; Susanne Weis; Robert Savoy; Kenneth Hugdahl
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Visual speech speeds up the neural processing of auditory speech.

Authors:  Virginie van Wassenhove; Ken W Grant; David Poeppel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Lexical inhibition and sublexical facilitation are surprisingly long lasting.

Authors:  Meghan Sumner; Arthur G Samuel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Bilateral speech comprehension reflects differential sensitivity to spectral and temporal features.

Authors:  Jonas Obleser; Frank Eisner; Sonja A Kotz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Functional anatomy of spatial mental imagery generated from verbal instructions.

Authors:  E Mellet; N Tzourio; F Crivello; M Joliot; M Denis; B Mazoyer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-10-15       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  The influence of acoustic and semantic similarity on long-term memory for word sequences.

Authors:  A D Baddeley
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1966-11       Impact factor: 2.143

8.  A method for removal of global effects from fMRI time series.

Authors:  Paul M Macey; Katherine E Macey; Rajesh Kumar; Ronald M Harper
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Hemispheric dissociation in access to the human semantic system.

Authors:  Guillaume Thierry; Anne Lise Giraud; Cathy Price
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2003-05-08       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Functional imaging of the auditory processing applied to speech sounds.

Authors:  Roy D Patterson; Ingrid S Johnsrude
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.237

View more
  30 in total

1.  Multiple imputation of missing fMRI data in whole brain analysis.

Authors:  Kenneth I Vaden; Mulugeta Gebregziabher; Stefanie E Kuchinsky; Mark A Eckert
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 2.  The cortical organization of speech processing: feedback control and predictive coding the context of a dual-stream model.

Authors:  Gregory Hickok
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 2.288

3.  Cingulo-Opercular Function During Word Recognition in Noise for Older Adults with Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Kenneth I Vaden; Stefanie E Kuchinsky; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Susan E Teubner-Rhodes; Judy R Dubno; Mark A Eckert
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.645

Review 4.  A review and synthesis of the first 20 years of PET and fMRI studies of heard speech, spoken language and reading.

Authors:  Cathy J Price
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  The cingulo-opercular network provides word-recognition benefit.

Authors:  Kenneth I Vaden; Stefanie E Kuchinsky; Stephanie L Cute; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno; Mark A Eckert
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Hierarchical organization of human auditory cortex: evidence from acoustic invariance in the response to intelligible speech.

Authors:  Kayoko Okada; Feng Rong; Jon Venezia; William Matchin; I-Hui Hsieh; Kourosh Saberi; John T Serences; Gregory Hickok
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Word intelligibility and age predict visual cortex activity during word listening.

Authors:  Stefanie E Kuchinsky; Kenneth I Vaden; Noam I Keren; Kelly C Harris; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno; Mark A Eckert
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Brain network dynamics in the human articulatory loop.

Authors:  Masaaki Nishida; Anna Korzeniewska; Nathan E Crone; Goichiro Toyoda; Yasuo Nakai; Noa Ofen; Erik C Brown; Eishi Asano
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 3.708

9.  Cortical activity predicts which older adults recognize speech in noise and when.

Authors:  Kenneth I Vaden; Stefanie E Kuchinsky; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno; Mark A Eckert
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Orthographic influence on spoken word identification: Behavioral and fMRI evidence.

Authors:  Christine Chiarello; Kenneth I Vaden; Mark A Eckert
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.