Literature DB >> 18923029

Composition and decomposition in bimanual dynamic learning.

Ian S Howard1, James N Ingram, Daniel M Wolpert.   

Abstract

Our ability to skillfully manipulate an object often involves the motor system learning to compensate for the dynamics of the object. When the two arms learn to manipulate a single object they can act cooperatively, whereas when they manipulate separate objects they control each object independently. We examined how learning transfers between these two bimanual contexts by applying force fields to the arms. In a coupled context, a single dynamic is shared between the arms, and in an uncoupled context separate dynamics are experienced independently by each arm. In a composition experiment, we found that when subjects had learned uncoupled force fields they were able to transfer to a coupled field that was the sum of the two fields. However, the contribution of each arm repartitioned over time so that, when they returned to the uncoupled fields, the error initially increased but rapidly reverted to the previous level. In a decomposition experiment, after subjects learned a coupled field, their error increased when exposed to uncoupled fields that were orthogonal components of the coupled field. However, when the coupled field was reintroduced, subjects rapidly readapted. These results suggest that the representations of dynamics for uncoupled and coupled contexts are partially independent. We found additional support for this hypothesis by showing significant learning of opposing curl fields when the context, coupled versus uncoupled, was alternated with the curl field direction. These results suggest that the motor system is able to use partially separate representations for dynamics of the two arms acting on a single object and two arms acting on separate objects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18923029      PMCID: PMC2637175          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3473-08.2008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  24 in total

1.  Differences in control of limb dynamics during dominant and nondominant arm reaching.

Authors:  R L Sainburg; D Kalakanis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Persistence of motor adaptation during constrained, multi-joint, arm movements.

Authors:  R A Scheidt; D J Reinkensmeyer; M A Conditt; W Z Rymer; F A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Learned dynamics of reaching movements generalize from dominant to nondominant arm.

Authors:  Sarah E Criscimagna-Hemminger; Opher Donchin; Michael S Gazzaniga; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Is interlimb transfer of force-field adaptation a cognitive response to the sudden introduction of load?

Authors:  Nicole Malfait; David J Ostry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Interlimb transfer of novel inertial dynamics is asymmetrical.

Authors:  Jinsung Wang; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-03-17       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Failure to consolidate the consolidation theory of learning for sensorimotor adaptation tasks.

Authors:  Graham Caithness; Rieko Osu; Paul Bays; Henry Chase; Jessica Klassen; Mitsuo Kawato; Daniel M Wolpert; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-10-06       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Adaptation to stable and unstable dynamics achieved by combined impedance control and inverse dynamics model.

Authors:  David W Franklin; Rieko Osu; Etienne Burdet; Mitsuo Kawato; Theodore E Milner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Single limb performance following contralateral bimanual limb training.

Authors:  Jamie Kaye Burgess; Rachel Bareither; James L Patton
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.802

9.  Phase transitions and critical behavior in human bimanual coordination.

Authors:  J A Kelso
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1984-06

10.  A neuroeconomics approach to inferring utility functions in sensorimotor control.

Authors:  Konrad P Körding; Izumi Fukunaga; Ian S Howard; James N Ingram; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2004-09-21       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Principles of sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  Daniel M Wolpert; Jörn Diedrichsen; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Context-dependent partitioning of motor learning in bimanual movements.

Authors:  Ian S Howard; James N Ingram; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Inter-limb interference during bimanual adaptation to dynamic environments.

Authors:  Maura Casadio; Vittorio Sanguineti; Valentina Squeri; Lorenzo Masia; Pietro Morasso
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-02-20       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Vestibular benefits to task savings in motor adaptation.

Authors:  A M E Sarwary; L P J Selen; W P Medendorp
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Gone in 0.6 seconds: the encoding of motor memories depends on recent sensorimotor states.

Authors:  Ian S Howard; James N Ingram; David W Franklin; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  The coordination of movement: optimal feedback control and beyond.

Authors:  Jörn Diedrichsen; Reza Shadmehr; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Discordant Tasks and Motor Adjustments Affect Interactions between Adaptations to Altered Kinematics and Dynamics.

Authors:  Fritzie Arce; Itai Novick; Eilon Vaadia
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Visuomotor coordination and cortical connectivity of modular motor learning.

Authors:  Pablo I Burgos; Juan J Mariman; Scott Makeig; Gonzalo Rivera-Lillo; Pedro E Maldonado
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Functional modulation of corticospinal excitability with adaptation of wrist movements to novel dynamical environments.

Authors:  Hiroshi Kadota; Masaya Hirashima; Daichi Nozaki
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Human sensorimotor cortex represents conflicting visuomotor mappings.

Authors:  Kenji Ogawa; Hiroshi Imamizu
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.