Literature DB >> 10938312

Persistence of motor adaptation during constrained, multi-joint, arm movements.

R A Scheidt1, D J Reinkensmeyer, M A Conditt, W Z Rymer, F A Mussa-Ivaldi.   

Abstract

We studied the stability of changes in motor performance associated with adaptation to a novel dynamic environment during goal-directed movements of the dominant arm. Eleven normal, human subjects made targeted reaching movements in the horizontal plane while holding the handle of a two-joint robotic manipulator. This robot was programmed to generate a novel viscous force field that perturbed the limb perpendicular to the desired direction of movement. Following adaptation to this force field, we sought to determine the relative role of kinematic errors and dynamic criteria in promoting recovery from the adapted state. In particular, we compared kinematic and dynamic measures of performance when kinematic errors were allowed to occur after removal of the viscous fields, or prevented by imposing a simulated, mechanical "channel" on movements. Hand forces recorded at the handle revealed that when kinematic errors were prevented from occurring by the application of the channel, recovery from adaptation to the novel field was much slower compared with when kinematic aftereffects were allowed to take place. In particular, when kinematic errors were prevented, subjects persisted in generating large forces that were unnecessary to generate an accurate reach. The magnitude of these forces decreased slowly over time, at a much slower rate than when subjects were allowed to make kinematic errors. This finding provides strong experimental evidence that both kinematic and dynamic criteria influence motor adaptation, and that kinematic-dependent factors play a dominant role in the rapid loss of adaptation after restoring the original dynamics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10938312     DOI: 10.1152/jn.2000.84.2.853

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  173 in total

1.  The case for an internal dynamics model versus equilibrium point control in human movement.

Authors:  Mark R Hinder; Theodore E Milner
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-04-25       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Visual, motor and attentional influences on proprioceptive contributions to perception of hand path rectilinearity during reaching.

Authors:  Robert A Scheidt; Kyle P Lillis; Scott J Emerson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Are we ready for a natural history of motor learning?

Authors:  Lior Shmuelof; John W Krakauer
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Accuracy of internal dynamics models in limb movements depends on stability.

Authors:  Theodore E Milner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-09       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Augmented dynamics and motor exploration as training for stroke.

Authors:  Felix C Huang; James L Patton
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Substituting auditory for visual feedback to adapt to altered dynamic and kinematic environments during reaching.

Authors:  Fabio Oscari; Riccardo Secoli; Federico Avanzini; Giulio Rosati; David J Reinkensmeyer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Absence of after-effects for observers after watching a visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Nicole T Ong; Nicola J Hodges
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Context-dependent partitioning of motor learning in bimanual movements.

Authors:  Ian S Howard; James N Ingram; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Generalization of dynamics learning across changes in movement amplitude.

Authors:  Andrew A G Mattar; David J Ostry
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Reorganization of finger coordination patterns during adaptation to rotation and scaling of a newly learned sensorimotor transformation.

Authors:  Xiaolin Liu; Kristine M Mosier; Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi; Maura Casadio; Robert A Scheidt
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.