Literature DB >> 22972999

Gone in 0.6 seconds: the encoding of motor memories depends on recent sensorimotor states.

Ian S Howard1, James N Ingram, David W Franklin, Daniel M Wolpert.   

Abstract

Real-world tasks often require movements that depend on a previous action or on changes in the state of the world. Here we investigate whether motor memories encode the current action in a manner that depends on previous sensorimotor states. Human subjects performed trials in which they made movements in a randomly selected clockwise or counterclockwise velocity-dependent curl force field. Movements during this adaptation phase were preceded by a contextual phase that determined which of the two fields would be experienced on any given trial. As expected from previous research, when static visual cues were presented in the contextual phase, strong interference (resulting in an inability to learn either field) was observed. In contrast, when the contextual phase involved subjects making a movement that was continuous with the adaptation-phase movement, a substantial reduction in interference was seen. As the time between the contextual and adaptation movement increased, so did the interference, reaching a level similar to that seen for static visual cues for delays >600 ms. This contextual effect generalized to purely visual motion, active movement without vision, passive movement, and isometric force generation. Our results show that sensorimotor states that differ in their recent temporal history can engage distinct representations in motor memory, but this effect decays progressively over time and is abolished by ∼600 ms. This suggests that motor memories are encoded not simply as a mapping from current state to motor command but are encoded in terms of the recent history of sensorimotor states.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22972999      PMCID: PMC3461895          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5909-11.2012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  52 in total

1.  Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching.

Authors:  J W Krakauer; M F Ghilardi; C Ghez
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Distinct motor plans form and retrieve distinct motor memories for physically identical movements.

Authors:  Masaya Hirashima; Daichi Nozaki
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Impedance control and internal model use during the initial stage of adaptation to novel dynamics in humans.

Authors:  Theodore E Milner; David W Franklin
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-06-16       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Endpoint stiffness of the arm is directionally tuned to instability in the environment.

Authors:  David W Franklin; Gary Liaw; Theodore E Milner; Rieko Osu; Etienne Burdet; Mitsuo Kawato
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-07-18       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Cerebellum predicts the future motor state.

Authors:  Timothy J Ebner; Siavash Pasalar
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.847

6.  Cortical preparatory activity: representation of movement or first cog in a dynamical machine?

Authors:  Mark M Churchland; John P Cunningham; Matthew T Kaufman; Stephen I Ryu; Krishna V Shenoy
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Long-term retention explained by a model of short-term learning in the adaptive control of reaching.

Authors:  Wilsaan M Joiner; Maurice A Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Colored context cues can facilitate the ability to learn and to switch between multiple dynamical force fields.

Authors:  Touria Addou; Nedialko Krouchev; John F Kalaska
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Gain field encoding of the kinematics of both arms in the internal model enables flexible bimanual action.

Authors:  Atsushi Yokoi; Masaya Hirashima; Daichi Nozaki
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model.

Authors:  T Flash; N Hogan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  49 in total

1.  Generalization and transfer of contextual cues in motor learning.

Authors:  A M E Sarwary; D F Stegeman; L P J Selen; W P Medendorp
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  The generalization of visuomotor learning to untrained movements and movement sequences based on movement vector and goal location remapping.

Authors:  Howard G Wu; Maurice A Smith
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Vestibular benefits to task savings in motor adaptation.

Authors:  A M E Sarwary; L P J Selen; W P Medendorp
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The 24-h savings of adaptation to novel movement dynamics initially reflects the recall of previous performance.

Authors:  Katrina P Nguyen; Weiwei Zhou; Erin McKenna; Katrina Colucci-Chang; Laurence C Jayet Bray; Eghbal A Hosseini; Laith Alhussein; Meena Rezazad; Wilsaan M Joiner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Generalization via superposition: combined effects of mixed reference frame representations for explicit and implicit learning in a visuomotor adaptation task.

Authors:  Eugene Poh; Jordan A Taylor
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering with single-molecule sensitivity using a plasmonic Fano resonance.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; Yu-Rong Zhen; Oara Neumann; Jared K Day; Peter Nordlander; Naomi J Halas
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 7.  A Dynamical Systems Perspective on Flexible Motor Timing.

Authors:  Evan D Remington; Seth W Egger; Devika Narain; Jing Wang; Mehrdad Jazayeri
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Altering attention to split-belt walking increases the generalization of motor memories across walking contexts.

Authors:  Dulce M Mariscal; Pablo A Iturralde; Gelsy Torres-Oviedo
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Assessing explicit strategies in force field adaptation.

Authors:  Raphael Schween; Samuel D McDougle; Mathias Hegele; Jordan A Taylor
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 10.  Computations in Sensorimotor Learning.

Authors:  Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  2015-04-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.