Literature DB >> 23575839

Human sensorimotor cortex represents conflicting visuomotor mappings.

Kenji Ogawa1, Hiroshi Imamizu.   

Abstract

Behavioral studies have shown that humans can adapt to conflicting sensorimotor mappings that cause interference after intensive training. While previous research works indicate the involvement of distinct brain regions for different types of motor learning (e.g., kinematics vs dynamics), the neural mechanisms underlying joint adaptation to conflicting mappings within the same type of perturbation (e.g., different angles of visuomotor rotation) remain unclear. To reveal the neural substrates that represent multiple sensorimotor mappings, we examined whether different mappings could be classified with multivoxel activity patterns of functional magnetic resonance imaging data. Participants simultaneously adapted to opposite rotational perturbations (+90° and - 90°) during visuomotor tracking. To dissociate differences in movement kinematics with rotation types, we used two distinct patterns of target motion and tested generalization of the classifier between different combinations of rotation and motion types. Results showed that the rotation types were classified significantly above chance using activities in the primary sensorimotor cortex and the supplementary motor area, despite no significant difference in averaged signal amplitudes within the region. In contrast, low-level sensorimotor components, including tracking error and movement speed, were best classified using activities of the early visual cortex. Our results reveal that the sensorimotor cortex represents different visuomotor mappings, which permits joint learning and switching between conflicting sensorimotor skills.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23575839      PMCID: PMC6619078          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4661-12.2013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  76 in total

1.  Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching.

Authors:  J W Krakauer; M F Ghilardi; C Ghez
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Adaptation to visual feedback delays in a human manual tracking task.

Authors:  A J Foulkes; R C Miall
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  A PET study of visuomotor learning under optical rotation.

Authors:  K Inoue; R Kawashima; K Satoh; S Kinomura; M Sugiura; R Goto; M Ito; H Fukuda
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain.

Authors:  N Tzourio-Mazoyer; B Landeau; D Papathanassiou; F Crivello; O Etard; N Delcroix; B Mazoyer; M Joliot
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: a primer with examples.

Authors:  Thomas E Nichols; Andrew P Holmes
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  fMR-adaptation: a tool for studying the functional properties of human cortical neurons.

Authors:  K Grill-Spector; R Malach
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2001-04

7.  Visuomotor rotations of varying size and direction compete for a single internal model in motor working memory.

Authors:  Virginia Wigmore; Christine Tong; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; M Kawato
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  1998-10

9.  Task-dependent changes in visual feedback control: a frequency analysis of human manual tracking.

Authors:  R C Miall
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 1.328

10.  Human cerebellar activity reflecting an acquired internal model of a new tool.

Authors:  H Imamizu; S Miyauchi; T Tamada; Y Sasaki; R Takino; B Pütz; T Yoshioka; M Kawato
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-01-13       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  15 in total

1.  Extinction interferes with the retrieval of visuomotor memories through a mechanism involving the sensorimotor cortex.

Authors:  Jorge I Villalta; Sofia M Landi; Ana Fló; Valeria Della-Maggiore
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Performing a reaching task with one arm while adapting to a visuomotor rotation with the other can lead to complete transfer of motor learning across the arms.

Authors:  Jinsung Wang; Yuming Lei; Jeffrey R Binder
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Hand-independent representation of tool-use pantomimes in the left anterior intraparietal cortex.

Authors:  Kenji Ogawa; Fumihito Imai
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-09-03       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Separating Visual and Motor Components of Motor Cortex Activation for Multiple Reach Targets: A Visuomotor Adaptation Study.

Authors:  Tineke Grent-'t-Jong; Robert Oostenveld; W Pieter Medendorp; Peter Praamstra
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Optimal visual-haptic integration with articulated tools.

Authors:  Chie Takahashi; Simon J Watt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-02-18       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Paradigm Shifts in Voluntary Force Control and Motor Unit Behaviors with the Manipulated Size of Visual Error Perception.

Authors:  Yi-Ching Chen; Yen-Ting Lin; Gwo-Ching Chang; Ing-Shiou Hwang
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  Diverse coordinate frames on sensorimotor areas in visuomotor transformation.

Authors:  Yusuke Fujiwara; Jongho Lee; Takahiro Ishikawa; Shinji Kakei; Jun Izawa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Motor adaptation is promoted by an incongruent Stroop task, but not by a congruent Stroop task.

Authors:  Takehide Kimura; Wataru Nakano
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Single-trial prediction of reaction time variability from MEG brain activity.

Authors:  Ryu Ohata; Kenji Ogawa; Hiroshi Imamizu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Neural Substrates Related to Motor Memory with Multiple Timescales in Sensorimotor Adaptation.

Authors:  Sungshin Kim; Kenji Ogawa; Jinchi Lv; Nicolas Schweighofer; Hiroshi Imamizu
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 8.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.