Literature DB >> 20685927

Context-dependent partitioning of motor learning in bimanual movements.

Ian S Howard1, James N Ingram, Daniel M Wolpert.   

Abstract

Human subjects easily adapt to single dynamic or visuomotor perturbations. In contrast, when two opposing dynamic or visuomotor perturbations are presented sequentially, interference is often observed. We examined the effect of bimanual movement context on interference between opposing perturbations using pairs of contexts, in which the relative direction of movement between the two arms was different across the pair. When each perturbation direction was associated with a different bimanual context, such as movement of the arms in the same direction versus movement in the opposite direction, interference was dramatically reduced. This occurred over a short period of training and was seen for both dynamic and visuomotor perturbations, suggesting a partitioning of motor learning for the different bimanual contexts. Further support for this was found in a series of transfer experiments. Having learned a single dynamic or visuomotor perturbation in one bimanual context, subjects showed incomplete transfer of this learning when the context changed, even though the perturbation remained the same. In addition, we examined a bimanual context in which one arm was moved passively and show that the reduction in interference requires active movement. The sensory consequences of movement are thus insufficient to allow opposing perturbations to be co-represented. Our results suggest different bimanual movement contexts engage at least partially separate representations of dynamics and kinematics in the motor system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20685927      PMCID: PMC2957447          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00299.2010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  39 in total

1.  Predictive motor learning of temporal delays.

Authors:  A G Witney; S J Goodbody; D M Wolpert
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Perceptual basis of bimanual coordination.

Authors:  F Mechsner; D Kerzel; G Knoblich; W Prinz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Conditions for interference versus facilitation during sequential sensorimotor adaptation.

Authors:  O Bock; S Schneider; J Bloomberg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Does the motor control system use multiple models and context switching to cope with a variable environment?

Authors:  A Karniel; F A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Neuronal populations in primary motor cortex encode bimanual arm movements.

Authors:  O Steinberg; O Donchin; A Gribova; S Cardosa de Oliveira; H Bergman; E Vaadia
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.386

6.  Visuomotor rotations of varying size and direction compete for a single internal model in motor working memory.

Authors:  Virginia Wigmore; Christine Tong; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Patterns of interference in sequence learning and prism adaptation inconsistent with the consolidation hypothesis.

Authors:  Kelly M Goedert; Daniel B Willingham
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.460

8.  Interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations: independence of direction and final position information.

Authors:  Robert L Sainburg; Jinsung Wang
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-06-26       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Learning not to generalize: modular adaptation of visuomotor gain.

Authors:  Toni S Pearson; John W Krakauer; Pietro Mazzoni
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Anticipatory adjustments in the unloading task: is an efference copy necessary for learning?

Authors:  Jörn Diedrichsen; Timothy Verstynen; Andrew Hon; Steven L Lehman; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-11-20       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  30 in total

Review 1.  Principles of sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  Daniel M Wolpert; Jörn Diedrichsen; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Natural error patterns enable transfer of motor learning to novel contexts.

Authors:  Gelsy Torres-Oviedo; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Vestibular benefits to task savings in motor adaptation.

Authors:  A M E Sarwary; L P J Selen; W P Medendorp
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The influence of proprioceptive state on learning control of reach dynamics.

Authors:  Andrea M Green; Jean-Philippe Labelle
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Using dual tasks to test immediate transfer of training between naturalistic movements: a proof-of-principle study.

Authors:  Sydney Y Schaefer; Catherine E Lang
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 1.328

6.  Gone in 0.6 seconds: the encoding of motor memories depends on recent sensorimotor states.

Authors:  Ian S Howard; James N Ingram; David W Franklin; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Oral administration of a recombinant attenuated Yersinia pseudotuberculosis strain elicits protective immunity against plague.

Authors:  Wei Sun; Shilpa Sanapala; Hannah Rahav; Roy Curtiss
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 3.641

8.  Restricted transfer of learning between unimanual and bimanual finger sequences.

Authors:  Atsushi Yokoi; Wenjun Bai; Jörn Diedrichsen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Maintained Representations of the Ipsilateral and Contralateral Limbs during Bimanual Control in Primary Motor Cortex.

Authors:  Kevin P Cross; Ethan A Heming; Douglas J Cook; Stephen H Scott
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 10.  Computations in Sensorimotor Learning.

Authors:  Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  2015-04-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.