Literature DB >> 1890448

A prospective study of intraoperative pulse oximetry failure.

P R Freund1, P T Overand, J Cooper, L Jacobson, S Bosse, B Walker, K L Posner, F W Cheney.   

Abstract

Since pulse oximetry is now an ASA standard for intraoperative monitoring, we sought to determine the intraoperative failure rate for this device. We prospectively evaluated the intraoperative failure rate of our pulse oximeters at the four University of Washington Hospitals (University of Washington Medical Center, Veterans Affairs Medical Center [VAMC], Children's Hospital and Medical Center, and Harborview Medical Center [HMC]) recorded from April 1989 to August 1989. We defined failure as the inability to obtain any oximetry reading for a cumulative period of more than 30 minutes during any anesthetic procedure after all equipment malfunctions had been eliminated. Our puse oximeters failed in 124 of 11,046 cases studied; this is a failure rate of 1.12%, which ranged from 0.56% at HMC to 4.24% at VAMC. The failure rate at VAMC (4.24%) was significantly higher than the other hospitals (p less than 0.001). Those cases associated with the pulse oximeter failure had the following characteristics: (1) an ASA status of 3 or higher, (2) lengthy operations, and (3) elderly patients. When the device did fail in a patient, it did not function for 32% of the mean anesthesia time. We conclude that the intraoperative use of the pulse oximetry can provide information about blood oxygen saturation in most patients. However, in approximately 1% of the patients we studied in the operating room, mechanically functioning pulse oximeters failed to provide readings of blood oxygen saturations during routine operative use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1890448     DOI: 10.1007/bf01619270

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit        ISSN: 0748-1977


  10 in total

Review 1.  Pulse oximetry.

Authors:  K K Tremper; S J Barker
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 2.  Pulse oximetry: analysis of theory, technology, and practice.

Authors:  M W Wukitsch; M T Petterson; D R Tobler; J A Pologe
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1988-10

3.  A clinical evaluation of the accuracy of the Nellcor N-100 and Ohmeda 3700 pulse oximeters.

Authors:  W T Cecil; K J Thorpe; E E Fibuch; G F Tuohy
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1988-01

4.  The prevalence of hypoxemia detected by pulse oximetry during recovery from anesthesia.

Authors:  R W Morris; A Buschman; D L Warren; J H Philip; D B Raemer
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1988-01

5.  Axillary artery compression and the prone position.

Authors:  T M Skeehan; F A Hensley
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  Evaluation of pulse oximetry.

Authors:  M Yelderman; W New
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 7.892

7.  A comprehensive computer system for anesthetic record retrieval.

Authors:  G Bashein; C R Barna
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 5.108

8.  Continuous monitoring of arterial oxygen saturation with pulse oximetry during transfer to the recovery room.

Authors:  I L Tyler; B Tantisira; P M Winter; E K Motoyama
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 5.108

9.  Errors in 14 pulse oximeters during profound hypoxia.

Authors:  J W Severinghaus; K H Naifeh; S O Koh
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1989-04

10.  A single-blind study of pulse oximetry in children.

Authors:  C J Coté; E A Goldstein; M A Coté; D C Hoaglin; J F Ryan
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 7.892

  10 in total
  6 in total

1.  Comparison of a prototype esophageal oximetry probe with two conventional digital pulse oximetry monitors in aortocoronary bypass patients.

Authors:  R C Prielipp; P E Scuderi; M H Hines; J L Atlee; J F Butterworth
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Filtering techniques for the removal of ventilator artefact in oesophageal pulse oximetry.

Authors:  K Shafqat; D P Jones; R M Langford; P A Kyriacou
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2006-07-21       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  The incidence of hypoxemia during surgery: evidence from two institutions.

Authors:  Jesse M Ehrenfeld; Luke M Funk; Johan Van Schalkwyk; Alan F Merry; Warren S Sandberg; Atul Gawande
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2010-07-31       Impact factor: 5.063

4.  Masimo signal extraction pulse oximetry.

Authors:  J M Goldman; M T Petterson; R J Kopotic; S J Barker
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.502

5.  A system for investigating oesophageal photoplethysmographic signals in anaesthetised patients.

Authors:  P A Kyriacou; A R Moye; A Gregg; D M Choi; R M Langford; D P Jones
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Failure rate of pulse oximetry in the postanesthesia care unit.

Authors:  B S Gillies; K Posner; P Freund; F Cheney
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1993-11
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.