Literature DB >> 18853556

The monocular-boundary-contour mechanism in binocular surface representation and suppression.

Eric A van Bogaert1, Teng Leng Ooi, Zijiang J He.   

Abstract

Boundary contours are important for representing binocular surfaces, including those in binocular rivalry. Ooi and He (2006, Perception 35 581-603) showed that a half-image with a boundary contour defined by abutting gratings predominates in binocular rivalry. We investigated the monocular-boundary-contour mechanism using Kanizsa square-like rivalry displays. In experiment 1, the left half-image had a vertical illusory contour on the right edge while the right half-image had a vertical illusory contour on the left edge. The Kanizsa elements (discs and pacmen) were filled with a 135 degree grating and placed on a 45 degree-grating background. When fused, observers experienced a strong predominance for perceiving an illusory rectangle in front of four discs. But this percept was replaced by robust rivalry alternations when the stimulus was manipulated by (i) switching the half-images between eyes, (ii)relocating the pacmen in each half-image to form horizontal illusory contours, or (iii) placing the pacmen diagonally (thus eliminating each monocular illusory contour). Such robust rivalry alternations were similar to those experienced when a 135 degree-grating disc was in rivalry with a 135 degree-grating pacman alone on the 45 degree-grating background (experiment 2). Experiment 3 showed that the relatively stable illusory-rectangle percept in experiment 1 is affected by the alignment of the images in the two eyes, in a manner consistent with adherence to the occlusion constraint in binocular surface formation.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18853556      PMCID: PMC2834235          DOI: 10.1068/p5986

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  27 in total

1.  Perceiving binocular depth with reference to a common surface.

Authors:  Z J He; T L Ooi
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  How context influences predominance during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Kenith V Sobel; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.490

3.  A distributed intercortical processing of binocular rivalry: psychophysical evidence.

Authors:  Teng Leng Ooi; Zijiang J He
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.490

4.  A fresh look at interocular grouping during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Sang-Hun Lee; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 5.  A neural theory of binocular rivalry.

Authors:  R Blake
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Mechanisms of contour perception in monkey visual cortex. II. Contours bridging gaps.

Authors:  E Peterhans; R von der Heydt
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Depth without disparity in random-dot stereograms.

Authors:  R P O'Shea; R Blake
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-09

8.  The spatial requirements for fine stereoacuity.

Authors:  S P McKee
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  The relationship between apparent depth and disparity in rivalrous-texture stereograms.

Authors:  J P Frisby; J E Mayhew
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 1.490

10.  Dynamics of subjective contour formation in the early visual cortex.

Authors:  T S Lee; M Nguyen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-01-30       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  9 in total

1.  Further support for the importance of the suppressive signal (pull) during the push-pull perceptual training.

Authors:  Jingping P Xu; Zijiang J He; Teng Leng Ooi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Revealing boundary-contour based surface representation through the time course of binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Yong R Su; Zijiang J He; Teng Leng Ooi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Coexistence of binocular integration and suppression determined by surface border information.

Authors:  Yong Su; Zijiang J He; Teng Leng Ooi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The magnitude and dynamics of interocular suppression affected by monocular boundary contour and conflicting local features.

Authors:  Yong R Su; Zijiang J He; Teng Leng Ooi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-07-17       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Perceptual mechanisms underlying amodal surface integration of 3-D stereoscopic stimuli.

Authors:  Zijiang J He; Teng Leng Ooi; Yong R Su
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Perceptual learning to reduce sensory eye dominance beyond the focus of top-down visual attention.

Authors:  Jingping P Xu; Zijiang J He; Teng Leng Ooi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Surface boundary contour strengthens image dominance in binocular competition.

Authors:  Jingping P Xu; Zijiang J He; Teng Leng Ooi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Understanding attentional modulation of binocular rivalry: a framework based on biased competition.

Authors:  Kevin Conrad Dieter; Duje Tadin
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Evidence in Support of the Border-Ownership Neurons for Representing Textured Figures.

Authors:  Chao Han; Wanyi Huang; Yong R Su; Zijiang J He; Teng Leng Ooi
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2020-07-21
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.