Literature DB >> 2648445

A neural theory of binocular rivalry.

R Blake.   

Abstract

When the two eyes view discrepant monocular stimuli, stable single vision gives way to alternating periods of monocular dominance; this is the well-known but little understood phenomenon of binocular rivalry. This article develops a neural theory of binocular rivalry that treats the phenomenon as the default outcome when binocular correspondence cannot be established. The theory posits the existence of monocular and binocular neurons arrayed within a functional processing module, with monocular neurons playing a crucial role in signaling the stimulus conditions instigating rivalry and generating inhibitory signals to implement suppression. Suppression is conceived as a local process happening in parallel over the entire cortical representation of the binocular visual field. The strength of inhibition causing suppression is related to the size of the pool of monocular neurons innervated by the suppressed eye, and the duration of a suppression phase is attributed to the strength of excitation generated by the suppressed stimulus. The theory is compared with three other contemporary theories of binocular rivalry. The article closes with a discussion of some of the unresolved problems related to the theory.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2648445     DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.96.1.145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rev        ISSN: 0033-295X            Impact factor:   8.934


  165 in total

Review 1.  A spiking neuron model for binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Carlo R Laing; Carson C Chow
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.621

2.  Oscillatory neuronal synchronization in primary visual cortex as a correlate of stimulus selection.

Authors:  Pascal Fries; Jan-Hinrich Schröder; Pieter R Roelfsema; Wolf Singer; Andreas K Engel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-05-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  The relationship between cortical activation and perception investigated with invisible stimuli.

Authors:  K Moutoussis; S Zeki
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-06-27       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Effects of ayahuasca on binocular rivalry with dichoptic stimulus alternation.

Authors:  E Frecska; K D White; L E Luna
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2004-01-08       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Activity patterns in human motion-sensitive areas depend on the interpretation of global motion.

Authors:  Miguel Castelo-Branco; Elia Formisano; Walter Backes; Friedhelm Zanella; Sergio Neuenschwander; Wolf Singer; Rainer Goebel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-10-04       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Can attention selectively bias bistable perception? Differences between binocular rivalry and ambiguous figures.

Authors:  Ming Meng; Frank Tong
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Computational evidence for a rivalry hierarchy in vision.

Authors:  Hugh R Wilson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-11-11       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  BINOCULAR RIVALRY AND NEURAL DYNAMICS.

Authors:  Randolph Blake; Sang-Hun Lee; David Heeger
Journal:  Psichologija (Vilniaus Univ)       Date:  2008-06-01

9.  Mechanisms for Frequency Control in Neuronal Competition Models.

Authors:  Rodica Curtu; Asya Shpiro; Nava Rubin; John Rinzel
Journal:  SIAM J Appl Dyn Syst       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.316

10.  Individual differences in the temporal dynamics of binocular rivalry and stimulus rivalry.

Authors:  Vaama Patel; Sjoerd Stuit; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.