Literature DB >> 20624411

The magnitude and dynamics of interocular suppression affected by monocular boundary contour and conflicting local features.

Yong R Su1, Zijiang J He, Teng Leng Ooi.   

Abstract

A monocular boundary contour (MBC) rivalry stimulus has two half-images, a homogeneous grating and the same homogeneous grating with an additional disc region. The outline/frame of the MBC disc is created by relative phase-shift, or orientation-difference. We found the increment contrast threshold and reaction time to detect a monocular Gabor probe elevated on the homogeneous half-image pedestal. The interocular suppression begins as early as 80ms upon stimulus onset. Moreover, the suppression magnitude is larger when the MBC disc is defined by orientation-difference rather than phase-shift, revealing the suppression caused by competing local features in addition to MBC. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  binocular rivalry; boundary contour; contrast gain control; increment threshold; interocular inhibition; reaction time

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20624411      PMCID: PMC2930096          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  47 in total

1.  The depth and selectivity of suppression in binocular rivalry.

Authors:  V A Nguyen; A W Freeman; P Wenderoth
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-02

2.  Binocular rivalry and visual awareness: the role of attention.

Authors:  T L Ooi; Z J He
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.490

3.  Visual responses in monkey areas V1 and V2 to three-dimensional surface configurations.

Authors:  J S Bakin; K Nakayama; C D Gilbert
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  The temporal course of suppression during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  H F Norman; J F Norman; J Bilotta
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.490

Review 5.  Visual competition.

Authors:  Randolph Blake; Nikos K Logothetis
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 34.870

6.  Interocular rivalry revealed in the human cortical blind-spot representation.

Authors:  F Tong; S A Engel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-05-10       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Coding of border ownership in monkey visual cortex.

Authors:  H Zhou; H S Friedman; R von der Heydt
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-09-01       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Evidence for perceptual "trapping" and adaptation in multistable binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Satoru Suzuki; Marcia Grabowecky
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-09-26       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  How context influences predominance during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Kenith V Sobel; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.490

10.  Surface boundary contour strengthens image dominance in binocular competition.

Authors:  Jingping P Xu; Zijiang J He; Teng Leng Ooi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  4 in total

1.  Revealing boundary-contour based surface representation through the time course of binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Yong R Su; Zijiang J He; Teng Leng Ooi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  A binocular perimetry study of the causes and implications of sensory eye dominance.

Authors:  Jingping P Xu; Zijiang J He; Teng Leng Ooi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-10-02       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Perceptual learning to reduce sensory eye dominance beyond the focus of top-down visual attention.

Authors:  Jingping P Xu; Zijiang J He; Teng Leng Ooi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Evidence in Support of the Border-Ownership Neurons for Representing Textured Figures.

Authors:  Chao Han; Wanyi Huang; Yong R Su; Zijiang J He; Teng Leng Ooi
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2020-07-21
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.