Literature DB >> 19805239

Coexistence of binocular integration and suppression determined by surface border information.

Yong Su1, Zijiang J He, Teng Leng Ooi.   

Abstract

The visual system relies on both the integration and interocular inhibitory processes to achieve single vision from different images in the two eyes. It is generally assumed that the integration process first searches for matching local features between the two eyes. If the matching fails, an interocular inhibitory process is triggered to suppress the image representation of one eye, leading to visual perception that is essentially contributed by the other eye. Here, using a stimulus comprising of binocularly corresponding features (vertical gratings) but incompatible surface border information, we found evidence to the contrary. In one half-image, a circular patch of vertical grating was phase-shifted relative to the surrounding vertical grating to create a circular, monocular boundary contour (MBC), while the other half-image had a similar vertical grating. The two half-images had a binocular disparity at the circular grating patch area, leading to the percept of a disc in depth. Concurrent with the stereo percept, threshold for detecting a Gabor probe on the half-image without the MBC was higher than that on the corresponding area with the grating disc, indicating binocular suppression. These findings reveal that when we perceive depth, which requires the integration process to obtain binocular disparity from the two eyes, one eye's image could simultaneously be suppressed from visual awareness by the interocular inhibitory process. Our study also presents a provocative example of where the brain selectively binds some, but not all, features of the images from the two eyes for visual perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19805239      PMCID: PMC2747231          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0903697106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  34 in total

1.  Binocular rivalry and visual awareness: the role of attention.

Authors:  T L Ooi; Z J He
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  Visual responses in monkey areas V1 and V2 to three-dimensional surface configurations.

Authors:  J S Bakin; K Nakayama; C D Gilbert
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Visual competition.

Authors:  Randolph Blake; Nikos K Logothetis
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 4.  Why we see things the way we do: evidence for a wholly empirical strategy of vision.

Authors:  D Purves; R B Lotto; S M Williams; S Nundy; Z Yang
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2001-03-29       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  A distributed intercortical processing of binocular rivalry: psychophysical evidence.

Authors:  Teng Leng Ooi; Zijiang J He
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  The monocular-boundary-contour mechanism in binocular surface representation and suppression.

Authors:  Eric A van Bogaert; Teng Leng Ooi; Zijiang J He
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  A new kind of stereoscopic vision.

Authors:  C Blakemore
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1970-11       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Stereoscopic depth and binocular rivalry.

Authors:  K N Ogle; J M Wakefield
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  The relationship between apparent depth and disparity in rivalrous-texture stereograms.

Authors:  J P Frisby; J E Mayhew
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 1.490

10.  Is binocular vision always monocular?

Authors:  R Blake; J Camisa
Journal:  Science       Date:  1978-06-30       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  14 in total

1.  Further support for the importance of the suppressive signal (pull) during the push-pull perceptual training.

Authors:  Jingping P Xu; Zijiang J He; Teng Leng Ooi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Revealing boundary-contour based surface representation through the time course of binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Yong R Su; Zijiang J He; Teng Leng Ooi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  The magnitude and dynamics of interocular suppression affected by monocular boundary contour and conflicting local features.

Authors:  Yong R Su; Zijiang J He; Teng Leng Ooi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-07-17       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  A binocular perimetry study of the causes and implications of sensory eye dominance.

Authors:  Jingping P Xu; Zijiang J He; Teng Leng Ooi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-10-02       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Perceptual learning to reduce sensory eye dominance beyond the focus of top-down visual attention.

Authors:  Jingping P Xu; Zijiang J He; Teng Leng Ooi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Detecting contrast changes in invisible patterns during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Sam Ling; Bjorn Hubert-Wallander; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-09-19       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 7.  Binocular vision.

Authors:  Randolph Blake; Hugh Wilson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Visuospatial sequence learning without seeing.

Authors:  Clive R Rosenthal; Christopher Kennard; David Soto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Surface boundary contour strengthens image dominance in binocular competition.

Authors:  Jingping P Xu; Zijiang J He; Teng Leng Ooi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Stereoscopic Depth Perception during Binocular Rivalry.

Authors:  Timothy J Andrews; David Holmes
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.