Literature DB >> 12696662

A distributed intercortical processing of binocular rivalry: psychophysical evidence.

Teng Leng Ooi1, Zijiang J He.   

Abstract

When dissimilar visual scenes are viewed dichoptically, the observer perceives several different representations of the scene over time. To reveal that a distributed intercortical network mediates this phenomenon of binocular rivalry, we used a Kanizsa square-like display consisting of four pairs of color-rivalry-inducing elements. We found that when all four dominant elements had the same color, regardless of whether they were from the same or different eyes, the visual system ably integrated them into a larger subjective surface. Once formed, the same-colored subjective surface enjoyed a relatively longer predominance than mixed-colored patterns. During rivalry alternation, this same-colored surface was more likely to be replaced by a complementary same-colored surface, rather than by mixed-colored patterns (cohesive effect). Further, surface integration, which is mainly an extrastriate cortical function, was stronger when the same eye viewed the same-colored rivalry stimuli. Since the eye-of-origin signature is explicitly represented in V1, these findings together suggest that rivalry is processed along a distributed network including V1 and the extrastriate cortices.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12696662     DOI: 10.1068/p3467

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  13 in total

1.  The monocular-boundary-contour mechanism in binocular surface representation and suppression.

Authors:  Eric A van Bogaert; Teng Leng Ooi; Zijiang J He
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  Coexistence of binocular integration and suppression determined by surface border information.

Authors:  Yong Su; Zijiang J He; Teng Leng Ooi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The magnitude and dynamics of interocular suppression affected by monocular boundary contour and conflicting local features.

Authors:  Yong R Su; Zijiang J He; Teng Leng Ooi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-07-17       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 4.  Does visual attention drive the dynamics of bistable perception?

Authors:  Kevin C Dieter; Jan Brascamp; Duje Tadin; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 5.  Binocular vision.

Authors:  Randolph Blake; Hugh Wilson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Spatial spread of interocular suppression is guided by stimulus configuration.

Authors:  Kazushi Maruya; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  Predominance of ground over ceiling surfaces in binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Kerem Ozkan; Myron L Braunstein
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Bistable perception in normal aging: perceptual reversibility and its relation to cognition.

Authors:  Mirella Díaz-Santos; Samantha Mauro; Bo Cao; Arash Yazdanbakhsh; Sandy Neargarder; Alice Cronin-Golomb
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2016-04-26

9.  Surface boundary contour strengthens image dominance in binocular competition.

Authors:  Jingping P Xu; Zijiang J He; Teng Leng Ooi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  The effects of categorical and linguistic adaptation on binocular rivalry initial dominance.

Authors:  Vassilis Pelekanos; Daphne Roumani; Konstantinos Moutoussis
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.