Literature DB >> 22273998

Further support for the importance of the suppressive signal (pull) during the push-pull perceptual training.

Jingping P Xu1, Zijiang J He, Teng Leng Ooi.   

Abstract

We previously designed a push-pull perceptual training protocol that effectively reduces sensory eye dominance (SED) and enhances binocular depth detection in human adults (Xu, He, & Ooi, 2010a). During the training, an attention cue precedes a pair of binocular competitive stimulus to induce dominance of the weak eye and suppression of the strong eye. To verify that the success of the protocol is due to the suppression of the signals evoked by the stimulus in the strong eye, rather than to the attention cueing per se, we employed two new push-pull training protocols that did not involve attention cueing. Instead, we used the specific configurations of the boundary contours of the binocular competitive stimulus to render the strong eye suppressed. The first, MBC push-pull protocol has a half-image with grating feature but no boundary contour in the strong eye. The second, BBC push-pull protocol has a half-image with both grating feature and boundary contour in the strong eye. For both protocols, the weak eye receives a half-image with strong grating feature and boundary contour. These boundary contour configurations ensure that the weak eye remains dominant while the strong eye is suppressed during training. Each observer was trained with both protocols at two parafoveal (2°) retinal locations. We found that both protocols significantly reduce SED and binocular depth threshold. This confirms the basis of the push-pull protocol is the suppression of the strong eye, rather than the attention cueing per se. We further found that the learning effect (SED reduction) is more effective in the BBC push-pull protocol where the suppressed half-image in the strong eye carries both grating feature and boundary contour information, than in the MBC push-pull protocol where the boundary contour information is absent from the strong eye's half-image. This suggests that the learning effect depends in part on the availability of the image attributes for processing (suppression) during the push-pull perceptual training.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22273998      PMCID: PMC3342430          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.01.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  49 in total

1.  Mechanisms of generalization in perceptual learning.

Authors:  Z Liu; D Weinshall
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Perceptual learning without perception.

Authors:  T Watanabe; J E Náñez; Y Sasaki
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-10-25       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Greater plasticity in lower-level than higher-level visual motion processing in a passive perceptual learning task.

Authors:  Takeo Watanabe; José E Náñez; Shinichi Koyama; Ikuko Mukai; Jacqueline Liederman; Yuka Sasaki
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Perceptual learning improves contrast sensitivity and visual acuity in adults with anisometropic amblyopia.

Authors:  Yifeng Zhou; Changbing Huang; Pengjing Xu; Liming Tao; Zhuping Qiu; Xiangrui Li; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Long-term speeding in perceptual switches mediated by attention-dependent plasticity in cortical visual processing.

Authors:  Satoru Suzuki; Marcia Grabowecky
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Attention-based perceptual learning increases binocular rivalry suppression of irrelevant visual features.

Authors:  Chris L E Paffen; Frans A J Verstraten; Zoltán Vidnyánszky
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Local GABA circuit control of experience-dependent plasticity in developing visual cortex.

Authors:  T K Hensch; M Fagiolini; N Mataga; M P Stryker; S Baekkeskov; S F Kash
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-11-20       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

9.  Human perceptual learning in identifying the oblique orientation: retinotopy, orientation specificity and monocularity.

Authors:  A A Schoups; R Vogels; G A Orban
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1995-03-15       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 10.  The dominant eye.

Authors:  C Porac; S Coren
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 17.737

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Perceptual learning: toward a comprehensive theory.

Authors:  Takeo Watanabe; Yuka Sasaki
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 24.137

2.  On Sensory Eye Dominance Revealed by Binocular Integrative and Binocular Competitive Stimuli.

Authors:  Chao Han; Zijiang J He; Teng Leng Ooi
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 4.799

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.