Literature DB >> 18842088

Retinotopic and non-retinotopic stimulus encoding in binocular rivalry and the involvement of feedback.

Jeroen J A van Boxtel1, David Alais, Raymond van Ee.   

Abstract

Adaptation is one of the key constituents of the perceptual alternation process during binocular rivalry, as it has been shown that preadapting one of the rivaling pairs before rivalry onset biases perception away from the adapted stimulus during rivalry. We investigated the influence of retinotopic and spatiotopic preadaptation on binocular rivalry. We show that for grating stimuli, preadaptation only influences rivalry when adaptation and rivalry locations are retinotopically matched. With more complex house and face stimuli, effects of preadaptation are found for both retinotopic and spatiotopic preadaptation, showing the importance of spatiotopic encoding in binocular rivalry. We show, furthermore, that adaptation to phase-scrambled faces results in retinotopic effects only, demonstrating the importance of form content for spatiotopic adaptation effects, as opposed to spatial frequency content. Are the spatiotopic adaptation influences on rivalry caused by direct spatiotopic stimulus interactions, or instead are they due to altered feedback from the adapted spatiotopic representations to the retinotopic representations that are involved in rivalry? By using rivaling face and grating stimuli that minimize rivalry between spatiotopic representations while still engaging these representations in stimulus encoding, we show that at least part of the preadaptation effects with face stimuli depend on feedback information.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18842088     DOI: 10.1167/8.5.17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  19 in total

Review 1.  United we sense, divided we fail: context-driven perception of ambiguous visual stimuli.

Authors:  P C Klink; R J A van Wezel; R van Ee
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Position specificity of adaptation-related face aftereffects.

Authors:  Márta Zimmer; Gyula Kovács
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  A monocular contribution to stimulus rivalry.

Authors:  Jan Brascamp; Hansem Sohn; Sang-Hun Lee; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Visual stability based on remapping of attention pointers.

Authors:  Patrick Cavanagh; Amelia R Hunt; Arash Afraz; Martin Rolfs
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Size matters: a study of binocular rivalry dynamics.

Authors:  Min-Suk Kang
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Spatial spread of interocular suppression is guided by stimulus configuration.

Authors:  Kazushi Maruya; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  The gender-specific face aftereffect is based in retinotopic not spatiotopic coordinates across several natural image transformations.

Authors:  Arash Afraz; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-09-10       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  What causes alternations in dominance during binocular rivalry?

Authors:  Min-Suk Kang; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Influence of retinal image shifts and extra-retinal eye movement signals on binocular rivalry alternations.

Authors:  Joke P Kalisvaart; Jeroen Goossens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Face distortion aftereffects evoked by featureless first-order stimulus configurations.

Authors:  Pál Vakli; Kornél Németh; Márta Zimmer; Stefan R Schweinberger; Gyula Kovács
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-12-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.