Literature DB >> 21242145

Position specificity of adaptation-related face aftereffects.

Márta Zimmer1, Gyula Kovács.   

Abstract

It has been shown that prolonged exposure to a human face leads to shape-selective visual aftereffects. It seems that these face-specific aftereffects (FAEs) have multiple components, related to the adaptation of earlier and higher level processing of visual stimuli. The largest magnitude of FAE, using long-term adaptation periods, is usually observed at the retinotopic position of the preceding adaptor stimulus. However, FAE is also detected, to a smaller degree, at other retinal positions in a spatially invariant way and this component depends less on the adaptation duration. Several lines of evidences suggest that while the position-specific FAE involves lower level areas of the ventral processing stream, the position-invariant FAE depends on the activation of higher level face-processing areas and the fusiform gyrus in particular. In the present paper, we summarize the available behavioural, electrophysiological and neuroimaging results regarding the spatial selectivity of FAE and discuss their implications for the visual stability of object representations across saccadic eye movements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21242145      PMCID: PMC3030836          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0265

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  97 in total

1.  Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition.

Authors:  I Gauthier; P Skudlarski; J C Gore; A W Anderson
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  The dynamics of visual adaptation to faces.

Authors:  David A Leopold; Gillian Rhodes; Kai-Markus Müller; Linda Jeffery
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Neural mechanisms for timing visual events are spatially selective in real-world coordinates.

Authors:  David Burr; Arianna Tozzi; M Concetta Morrone
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2007-03-18       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Early face processing specificity: it's in the eyes!

Authors:  Roxane J Itier; Claude Alain; Katherine Sedore; Anthony R McIntosh
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  The M170 reflects a viewpoint-dependent representation for both familiar and unfamiliar faces.

Authors:  Michael P Ewbank; William A P Smith; Edwin R Hancock; Timothy J Andrews
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-05-16       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 6.  How does the brain process upright and inverted faces?

Authors:  Bruno Rossion; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev       Date:  2002-03

7.  The initial representation of individual faces in the right occipito-temporal cortex is holistic: electrophysiological evidence from the composite face illusion.

Authors:  Corentin Jacques; Bruno Rossion
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  A human parietal face area contains aligned head-centered visual and tactile maps.

Authors:  Martin I Sereno; Ruey-Song Huang
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-09-24       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  Visual mental imagery and perception produce opposite adaptation effects on early brain potentials.

Authors:  Giorgio Ganis; Haline E Schendan
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Neural correlates of generic versus gender-specific face adaptation.

Authors:  Nadine Kloth; Stefan R Schweinberger; Gyula Kovács
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  11 in total

1.  Neural correlates of after-effects caused by adaptation to multiple face displays.

Authors:  Krisztina Nagy; Márta Zimmer; Mark W Greenlee; Gyula Kovács
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Visual stability.

Authors:  David Melcher
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Spatiotopic coding and remapping in humans.

Authors:  David C Burr; Maria Concetta Morrone
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Spatial selectivity in adaptation to gaze direction.

Authors:  Colin J Palmer; Colin W G Clifford
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 5.530

5.  Position selectivity in face-sensitive visual cortex to facial and nonfacial stimuli: an fMRI study.

Authors:  David F Nichols; Lisa R Betts; Hugh R Wilson
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2016-09-04       Impact factor: 2.708

6.  Face distortion aftereffects evoked by featureless first-order stimulus configurations.

Authors:  Pál Vakli; Kornél Németh; Márta Zimmer; Stefan R Schweinberger; Gyula Kovács
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-12-17

7.  A reinvestigation of the reference frame of the tilt-adaptation aftereffect.

Authors:  Sebastiaan Mathôt; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Visual duration aftereffect is position invariant.

Authors:  Baolin Li; Xiangyong Yuan; Youguo Chen; Peiduo Liu; Xiting Huang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-10-09

9.  Adaptation Duration Dissociates Category-, Image-, and Person-Specific Processes on Face-Evoked Event-Related Potentials.

Authors:  Márta Zimmer; Adriana Zbanţ; Kornél Németh; Gyula Kovács
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-12-22

10.  Object responses are highly malleable, rather than invariant, with changes in object appearance.

Authors:  Desiree E Holler; Sara Fabbri; Jacqueline C Snow
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.