Literature DB >> 19810791

The gender-specific face aftereffect is based in retinotopic not spatiotopic coordinates across several natural image transformations.

Arash Afraz1, Patrick Cavanagh.   

Abstract

In four experiments, we measured the gender-specific face-aftereffect following subject's eye movement, head rotation, or head movement toward the display and following movement of the adapting stimulus itself to a new test location. In all experiments, the face aftereffect was strongest at the retinal position, orientation, and size of the adaptor. There was no advantage for the spatiotopic location in any experiment nor was there an advantage for the location newly occupied by the adapting face after it moved in the final experiment. Nevertheless, the aftereffect showed a broad gradient of transfer across location, orientation and size that, although centered on the retinotopic values of the adapting stimulus, covered ranges far exceeding the tuning bandwidths of neurons in early visual cortices. These results are consistent with a high-level site of adaptation (e.g. FFA) where units of face analysis have modest coverage of visual field, centered in retinotopic coordinates, but relatively broad tolerance for variations in size and orientation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19810791      PMCID: PMC2792707          DOI: 10.1167/9.10.10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  55 in total

1.  The reviewing of object files: object-specific integration of information.

Authors:  D Kahneman; A Treisman; B J Gibbs
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  Oculomotor control and spatial processing.

Authors:  M E Goldberg; C L Colby
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 3.  Course control and tracking: orientation through image stabilization.

Authors:  K Kirschfeld
Journal:  EXS       Date:  1997

4.  What's in an object file? Evidence from priming studies.

Authors:  R D Gordon; D E Irwin
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-11

Review 5.  Spatial representations for action in parietal cortex.

Authors:  C L Colby; J R Duhamel
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  1996-12

6.  Spatial reference in weightlessness: perceptual factors and mental representations.

Authors:  A D Friederici; W J Levelt
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-03

7.  Interactions among spatial frequency and orientation channels adapted concurrently.

Authors:  M W Greenlee; S Magnussen
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 8.  How are three-dimensional objects represented in the brain?

Authors:  H H Bülthoff; S Y Edelman; M J Tarr
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1995 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Object and head orientation effects on symmetry perception defined by shape from shading.

Authors:  P Wenderoth; N Hickey
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.490

10.  Effect of localized grating adaptation as a function of separation along the length axis between test and adaptation areas.

Authors:  Y Ejima; S Takahashi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  29 in total

1.  Higher level visual cortex represents retinotopic, not spatiotopic, object location.

Authors:  Julie D Golomb; Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Neural correlates of after-effects caused by adaptation to multiple face displays.

Authors:  Krisztina Nagy; Márta Zimmer; Mark W Greenlee; Gyula Kovács
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Visual attention and stability.

Authors:  Sebastiaan Mathôt; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Position specificity of adaptation-related face aftereffects.

Authors:  Márta Zimmer; Gyula Kovács
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Eye movements help link different views in scene-selective cortex.

Authors:  Julie D Golomb; Alice R Albrecht; Soojin Park; Marvin M Chun
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Object-location binding across a saccade: A retinotopic spatial congruency bias.

Authors:  Anna Shafer-Skelton; Colin N Kupitz; Julie D Golomb
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 7.  A review of visual aftereffects in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Katharine N Thakkar; Steven M Silverstein; Jan W Brascamp
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2019-03-30       Impact factor: 8.989

8.  Integrating retinotopic features in spatiotopic coordinates.

Authors:  William J Harrison; Peter J Bex
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Visual stability based on remapping of attention pointers.

Authors:  Patrick Cavanagh; Amelia R Hunt; Arash Afraz; Martin Rolfs
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Robustness of the retinotopic attentional trace after eye movements.

Authors:  Julie D Golomb; Vina Z Pulido; Alice R Albrecht; Marvin M Chun; James A Mazer
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.