Literature DB >> 8113135

New off-line method for detecting spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in human subjects.

C L Talmadge1, G R Long, W J Murphy, A Tubis.   

Abstract

Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions were evaluated in 36 female and 40 male subjects. In agreement with the results of previous surveys, emissions were found to be more prevalent in female subjects and there was a tendency for the male subjects to have fewer emissions in their left ears. The digitization of five minute samples of ear canal signals, combined with sophisticated data analysis, produced a substantial reduction in the emission detection threshold. 588 emissions were detected in 72% of the subjects and 56% of the ears. Of the observed emissions, 18 could be identified with cubic distortion products of other emissions, and 11 could be identified as harmonic products (i.e., integral frequency multiples of other emissions). The large number of emissions detected (one subject had 32 in her right ear and 25 in her left) permitted evaluation of the pattern of separation of emissions. The average effective separation along the basilar membrane (according to the Greenwood frequency map) for adjacent emissions of all ears was 0.427 mm with interquartile values of 0.387 mm and 0.473 mm. The relationship between emission power, frequency, and full width at half maximum appears to be in agreement with the implications of a noise perturbed Van der Pol oscillator model of spontaneous emissions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8113135     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(93)90032-v

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  33 in total

1.  Long-term stability of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Edward M Burns
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effects of low-frequency biasing on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions: frequency modulation.

Authors:  Lin Bian
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  Mechanics of the frog ear.

Authors:  Pim Van Dijk; Matthew J Mason; Richard L M Schoffelen; Peter M Narins; Sebastiaan W F Meenderink
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Comparison of the auditory systems of heterosexuals and homosexuals: click-evoked otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  D McFadden; E G Pasanen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-03-03       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Characterizing spontaneous otoacoustic emissions across the human lifespan.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Ping Luo; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Compensating for ear-canal acoustics when measuring otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  An active oscillator model describes the statistics of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Florian Fruth; Frank Jülicher; Benjamin Lindner
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  All that jazz coming out of my ears.

Authors:  Pascal Martin
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Sex differences in distortion-product and transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions compared.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Glen K Martin; Barden B Stagner; Mindy M Maloney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 10.  Masculinization of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.