Literature DB >> 18830796

The 2008 Frank Stinchfield award: variation in postoperative pelvic tilt may confound the accuracy of hip navigation systems.

Sebastien Parratte1, Mark W Pagnano, Krista Coleman-Wood, Kenton R Kaufman, Daniel J Berry.   

Abstract

Most computer navigation systems used in total hip arthroplasty integrate preoperative pelvic tilt to calculate the anterior pelvic plane assuming tilt is constant; however, the consistency of pelvic tilt after THA has never been proven. Therefore, using a modern comprehensive gait analysis before and after arthroplasty we sought to compare (1) dynamic pelvic tilt changes and (2) pelvic flexion/extension range-of-motion changes. Twenty-one patients who underwent unilateral THA were prospectively studied. Quantitative pelvic tilt changes (in the sagittal plane) and pelvic range of flexion/extension motion relative to a laboratory coordinate system were compared using a computerized video motion system. Mean gait pelvic tilt was 13.9 masculine +/- 4.8 masculine (range, 1.73 masculine-23.1 masculine) preoperatively, 12.5 masculine +/- 4.5 masculine (range, 1.4 masculine-18.7 masculine) 2 months postoperatively, and 10.5 degrees +/- 5.5 masculine (range, -2.36 masculine-19.2 masculine) 12 months postoperatively. A significant proportion (31%) of patients had more than a 5 degrees difference between preoperative and 12-month postoperative measurements and the variability was spread over 20 degrees . Significant dynamic changes in pelvic tilt occurred after THA. While navigation clearly improves the anatomical position of the component during THA, the functional position of the component will not always be improved because of the significant change between preoperative and postoperative pelvic tilt.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18830796      PMCID: PMC2600967          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0521-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  25 in total

1.  Comparison of a mechanical acetabular alignment guide with computer placement of the socket.

Authors:  Anthony M Digioia; Branislav Jaramaz; Anton Y Plakseychuk; James E Moody; Constantinos Nikou; Richard S Labarca; Timothy J Levison; Frederic Picard
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Cross-validation of marker configurations to measure pelvic kinematics in gait.

Authors:  Lutz Vogt; Martin Portscher; Kirsten Brettmann; Klaus Pfeifer; Winfried Banzer
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.840

3.  Anatomical factors in the stability of the hip joint in the newborn.

Authors:  B McKibbin
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1970-02

4.  Variations of pelvic anteversion in the lying and standing positions: analysis of 24 control subjects and implications for CT measurement of position of a prosthetic cup.

Authors:  T A Eddine; H Migaud; C Chantelot; A Cotten; C Fontaine; A Duquennoy
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.246

5.  Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties.

Authors:  G E Lewinnek; J L Lewis; R Tarr; C L Compere; J R Zimmerman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios.

Authors:  D D D'Lima; A G Urquhart; K O Buehler; R H Walker; C W Colwell
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Factors predisposing to dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty: a multivariate analysis.

Authors:  B M Jolles; P Zangger; P-F Leyvraz
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Measurements of pelvic flexion angle using three-dimensional computed tomography.

Authors:  Shunsaku Nishihara; Nobuhiko Sugano; Takashi Nishii; Kenji Ohzono; Hideki Yoshikawa
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Walking patterns of hip arthroplasty patients: some observations on the medio-lateral excursions of the trunk.

Authors:  L Vogt; K Brettmann; K Pfeifer; W Banzer
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2003-04-08       Impact factor: 3.033

10.  Recovery of walking speed and symmetrical movement of the pelvis and lower extremity joints after unilateral THA.

Authors:  Hidenobu Miki; Nobuhiko Sugano; Keisuke Hagio; Takashi Nishii; Hideo Kawakami; Akihiro Kakimoto; Nobuo Nakamura; Hideki Yoshikawa
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.712

View more
  27 in total

1.  Improving cup positioning using a mechanical navigation instrument.

Authors:  Simon D Steppacher; Jens H Kowal; Stephen Barry Murphy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Pelvic tilt compensates for increased acetabular anteversion.

Authors:  Robert K Zahn; Sarah Grotjohann; Heiko Ramm; Stefan Zachow; Michael Putzier; Carsten Perka; Stephan Tohtz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-30       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  MyHip: supporting planning and surgical guidance for a better total hip arthroplasty : A pilot study.

Authors:  Jérôme Schmid; Christophe Chênes; Sylvain Chagué; Pierre Hoffmeyer; Panayiotis Christofilopoulos; Massimiliano Bernardoni; Caecilia Charbonnier
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Current standard rules of combined anteversion prevent prosthetic impingement but ignore osseous contact in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Markus Weber; Michael Woerner; Benjamin Craiovan; Florian Voellner; Michael Worlicek; Hans-Robert Springorum; Joachim Grifka; Tobias Renkawitz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Changes in spinopelvic indices after hip arthroplasty and its influence on acetabular component orientation.

Authors:  Siddharth Mahesh Shah; Selin Munir; William Lindsay Walter
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2017-08-01

6.  Reply to the Letter to the Editor: Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: No Benefit after THA Performed with Computer-assisted Cup Placement: 10-year Results of a Randomized Controlled Study.

Authors:  Sebastien Parratte; Matthieu Ollivier; Alexandre Lunebourg; Xavier Flecher; Jean-Noel A Argenson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Pelvic flexion measurement from lateral projection radiographs is clinically reliable.

Authors:  Norio Imai; Tomoyuki Ito; Ken Suda; Dai Miyasaka; Naoto Endo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  The impact of standard combined anteversion definitions on gait and clinical outcome within one year after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Markus Weber; Tim Weber; Michael Woerner; Benjamin Craiovan; Michael Worlicek; Sebastian Winkler; Joachim Grifka; Tobias Renkawitz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Soft tissue restricts impingement-free mobility in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michael Woerner; Markus Weber; Ernst Sendtner; Robert Springorum; Michael Worlicek; Benjamin Craiovan; Joachim Grifka; Tobias Renkawitz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Pelvic tilt is minimally changed by total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  William S Murphy; Greg Klingenstein; Stephen B Murphy; Guoyan Zheng
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.