OBJECTIVE: To evaluate spinopelvic changes after hip arthroplasty in standing and ready-to-rise positions. METHODS: We compared pelvic tilt, sacral slope, cobb's angle, and hip flexion on pre and postoperative spinopelvic radiographs. RESULTS: Standing: All postoperative indices were similar to preoperative ones except sacral slope (mean difference:1.6°, p = 0.046). Ready-to-rise: All postoperative indices were similar to preoperative ones except pelvic tilt which was significantly greater postoperatively (mean difference: 5.1°, p = 0.017). Fifteen patients showed >10° increase in pelvic tilt postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Changes in pelvic tilt in ready-to-rise position can predispose to posterior edge loading, edge wear, and dislocation; especially with inadequate cup anteversion.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate spinopelvic changes after hip arthroplasty in standing and ready-to-rise positions. METHODS: We compared pelvic tilt, sacral slope, cobb's angle, and hip flexion on pre and postoperative spinopelvic radiographs. RESULTS: Standing: All postoperative indices were similar to preoperative ones except sacral slope (mean difference:1.6°, p = 0.046). Ready-to-rise: All postoperative indices were similar to preoperative ones except pelvic tilt which was significantly greater postoperatively (mean difference: 5.1°, p = 0.017). Fifteen patients showed >10° increase in pelvic tilt postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Changes in pelvic tilt in ready-to-rise position can predispose to posterior edge loading, edge wear, and dislocation; especially with inadequate cup anteversion.
Entities:
Keywords:
APP, anterior pelvic plane; ASIS, anterior superior iliac spine; DAA, direct anterior approach; Edge loading; FPP, functional pelvic plane; OA, osteoarthritis; Pelvic tilt; ROM, range of motion; SD, standard deviation; Spinopelvic; THA, total hip arthroplasty; Total hip arthroplasty
Authors: Sebastien Parratte; Mark W Pagnano; Krista Coleman-Wood; Kenton R Kaufman; Daniel J Berry Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2008-10-02 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Joseph D Maratt; Christina I Esposito; Alexander S McLawhorn; Seth A Jerabek; Douglas E Padgett; David J Mayman Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2014-10-23 Impact factor: 4.757
Authors: Anthony M DiGioia; Mahmoud A Hafez; Branislav Jaramaz; Timothy J Levison; James E Moody Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 4.176