Literature DB >> 18823209

Eye movements when reading transposed text: the importance of word-beginning letters.

Sarah J White1, Rebecca L Johnson, Simon P Liversedge, Keith Rayner.   

Abstract

Participants' eye movements were recorded as they read sentences with words containing transposed adjacent letters. Transpositions were either external (e.g., problme, rpoblem) or internal (e.g., porblem, probelm) and at either the beginning (e.g., rpoblem, porblem) or end (e.g., problme, probelm) of words. The results showed disruption for words with transposed letters compared to the normal baseline condition, and the greatest disruption was observed for word-initial transpositions. In Experiment 1, transpositions within low frequency words led to longer reading times than when letters were transposed within high frequency words. Experiment 2 demonstrated that the position of word-initial letters is most critical even when parafoveal preview of words to the right of fixation is unavailable. The findings have important implications for the roles of different letter positions in word recognition and the effects of parafoveal preview on word recognition processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18823209      PMCID: PMC2662926          DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.5.1261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  40 in total

1.  Lateralized word recognition: assessing the role of hemispheric specialization, modes of lexical access, and perceptual asymmetry.

Authors:  T R Jordan; G R Patching; A D Milner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Does jugde activate COURT? Transposed-letter similarity effects in masked associative priming.

Authors:  Manuel Perea; Stephen J Lupker
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-09

3.  Orthographic processing in visual word identification.

Authors:  G W Humphreys; L J Evett; P T Quinlan
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Facilitative orthographic neighborhood effects: the SERIOL model account.

Authors:  Carol Whitney; Michal Lavidor
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  The orthographic uniqueness point and eye movements during reading.

Authors:  Brett Miller; Barbara J Juhasz; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2006-05

6.  Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: implications for attention and eye movement control.

Authors:  J M Henderson; F Ferreira
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  The influence of lexical and conceptual constraints on reading mixed-language sentences: evidence from eye fixations and naming times.

Authors:  J Altarriba; J F Kroll; A Sholl; K Rayner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1996-07

8.  Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity.

Authors:  K Rayner; S A Duffy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1986-05

9.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming.

Authors:  M S Seidenberg; J L McClelland
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Eye movements when reading disappearing text: the importance of the word to the right of fixation.

Authors:  Keith Rayner; Simon P Liversedge; Sarah J White
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-08-08       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  31 in total

1.  Are all Semitic languages immune to letter transpositions? The case of Maltese.

Authors:  Manuel Perea; Albert Gatt; Carmen Moret-Tatay; Ray Fabri
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-10

2.  Semantic predictability eliminates the transposed-letter effect.

Authors:  Steven G Luke; Kiel Christianson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-05

3.  Eye movements and the use of parafoveal word length information in reading.

Authors:  Barbara J Juhasz; Sarah J White; Simon P Liversedge; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Revisiting Huey: on the importance of the upper part of words during reading.

Authors:  Manuel Perea
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-12

5.  Word skipping during sentence reading: effects of lexicality on parafoveal processing.

Authors:  Wonil Choi; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Morpheme Transposition of Two-Character Chinese Words in Vertical Visual Fields.

Authors:  Hong-Wen Cao; Cheng Chen; Hong-Mei Yan
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2021-01-04

7.  How orthographic-specific characteristics shape letter position coding: The case of Thai script.

Authors:  Manuel Perea; Heather Winskel; Pablo Gomez
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-02

8.  Reversed preview benefit effects: Forced fixations emphasize the importance of parafoveal vision for efficient reading.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter; Mallorie Leinenger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Reading in schizophrenic subjects and their nonsymptomatic first-degree relatives.

Authors:  Eryl O Roberts; Frank A Proudlock; Kate Martin; Michael A Reveley; Mohammed Al-Uzri; Irene Gottlob
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 9.306

10.  ERP correlates of letter identity and letter position are modulated by lexical frequency.

Authors:  Marta Vergara-Martínez; Manuel Perea; Pablo Gómez; Tamara Y Swaab
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 2.381

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.