Literature DB >> 10884017

Lateralized word recognition: assessing the role of hemispheric specialization, modes of lexical access, and perceptual asymmetry.

T R Jordan1, G R Patching, A D Milner.   

Abstract

The processing advantage for words in the right visual field (RVF) has often been assigned to parallel orthographic analysis by the left hemisphere and sequential by the right. The authors investigated this notion using the Reicher-Wheeler task to suppress influences of guesswork and an eye-tracker to ensure central fixation. RVF advantages obtained for all serial positions and identical U-shaped serial-position curves obtained for both visual fields (Experiments 1-4). These findings were not influenced by lexical constraint (Experiment 2) and were obtained with masked and nonmasked displays (Experiment 3). Moreover, words and nonwords produced similar serial-position effects in each field, but only RVF stimuli produced a word-nonword effect (Experiment 4). These findings support the notion that left-hemisphere function underlies the RVF advantage but not the notion that each hemisphere uses a different mode of orthographic analysis.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10884017     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.26.3.1192

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  10 in total

1.  Assessing the role of different spatial frequencies in word perception by good and poor readers.

Authors:  Geoffrey R Patching; Timothy R Jordan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-09

2.  Reevaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: hemispheric dominance, retinal location, and the word-nonword effect.

Authors:  Timothy R Jordan; Kevin B Paterson; Stoyan Kurtev
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Hemispheric differences in orthographic and semantic processing as revealed by event-related potentials.

Authors:  Danielle S Dickson; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  The last course of coarse coding: Hemispheric similarities in associative and categorical semantic processing.

Authors:  Emily N Mech; Padmapriya Kandhadai; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 2.781

5.  Evaluating effects of divided hemispheric processing on word recognition in foveal and extrafoveal displays: the evidence from Arabic.

Authors:  Abubaker A A Almabruk; Kevin B Paterson; Victoria McGowan; Timothy R Jordan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Aging and Pattern Complexity Effects on the Visual Span: Evidence from Chinese Character Recognition.

Authors:  Fang Xie; Lin Li; Sainan Zhao; Jingxin Wang; Kevin B Paterson; Sarah J White; Kayleigh L Warrington
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2019-03-22

7.  Do first and last letters carry more weight in the mechanism behind word familiarity?

Authors:  Andrew M Huebert; Anne M Cleary
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-04-05

8.  Eye movements when reading transposed text: the importance of word-beginning letters.

Authors:  Sarah J White; Rebecca L Johnson; Simon P Liversedge; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Visual speech perception in foveal and extrafoveal vision: further implications for divisions in hemispheric projections.

Authors:  Timothy R Jordan; Mercedes Sheen; Lily Abedipour; Kevin B Paterson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Investigating the Effectiveness of Spatial Frequencies to the Left and Right of Central Vision during Reading: Evidence from Reading Times and Eye Movements.

Authors:  Timothy R Jordan; Victoria A McGowan; Stoyan Kurtev; Kevin B Paterson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-07-18
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.