Literature DB >> 33394304

Morpheme Transposition of Two-Character Chinese Words in Vertical Visual Fields.

Hong-Wen Cao1,2, Cheng Chen3, Hong-Mei Yan4.   

Abstract

The present study explored the morpheme transposition process of two-character Chinese words in the upper and lower visual fields by adopting a dual-target rapid serial visual presentation paradigm. The results showed that the identification accuracy of canonical words was better in the lower visual field, whereas the accuracy of transposed words was almost identical in the upper and lower visual fields. Furthermore, there was no significant difference between canonical and transposed words at 0°, 2°, 4°, and 6° eccentricities in the upper visual field. However, the accuracy of canonical words was markedly higher than that of transposed words at 2°, 4°, and 6° eccentricities in the lower visual field. Finally, the character order errors mainly occurred at 0°eccentricity with a duration of 100 ms in vertical visual fields. These findings, taken together, indicated that the character transposition affected the lexical process of two-character Chinese words in the lower visual field but not in the upper visual field, and the character order of words was more likely to be reversed at 0° eccentricity and the initial stage of visual word processing in vertical reading.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC part of Springer Nature.

Keywords:  Character order errors; Chinese words; Lexical processing; Morpheme transposition; Vertical asymmetries

Year:  2021        PMID: 33394304     DOI: 10.1007/s10936-020-09748-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res        ISSN: 0090-6905


  37 in total

1.  A comparison of upper vs. lower and right vs. left visual fields using lexical decision.

Authors:  A Goldstein; H Babkoff
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2001-11

2.  Superior performance for visually guided pointing in the lower visual field.

Authors:  J Danckert; M A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Perception of words and non-words in the upper and lower visual fields.

Authors:  Iain T Darker; Timothy R Jordan
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.381

4.  The spatial coding model of visual word identification.

Authors:  Colin J Davis
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Influence of case type, word frequency, and exposure duration on visual word recognition.

Authors:  P A Allen; B Wallace; T A Weber
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

7.  Phenomenal simutaneity and the perceptual moment hypothesis.

Authors:  D A Allport
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1968-11

8.  A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation.

Authors:  M M Chun; M C Potter
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Left-right and upper-lower visual field asymmetries for face matching, letter naming, and lexical decision.

Authors:  Rogier E Hagenbeek; Jan W Van Strien
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.310

10.  Character Decomposition and Transposition Processes in Chinese Compound Words Modulates Attentional Blink.

Authors:  Hongwen Cao; Min Gao; Hongmei Yan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-06-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.