Literature DB >> 18816985

Evaluating preference assessments for use in the general education population.

Jennifer L Resetar1, George H Noell.   

Abstract

This study compared the effectiveness of a multiple-stimulus-without-replacement (MSWO) preference assessment and teacher preference ranking in identifying reinforcers for use in a general education setting with typically developing elementary-school children. The mean number of digits correctly answered was greater in the MSWO-selected reward and the teacher-selected reward conditions relative to the no-reward condition for 2 of the 4 participants, but there were no differences between the MSWO-selected and teacher-selected reward conditions for any participant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18816985      PMCID: PMC2521861          DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2008.41-447

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal        ISSN: 0021-8855


  9 in total

1.  Further evaluation of the multiple-stimulus preference assessment.

Authors:  T S Higbee; J E Carr; C D Harrison
Journal:  Res Dev Disabil       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb

2.  Evaluation of absolute and relative reinforcer value using progressive-ratio schedules.

Authors:  Monica T Francisco; John C Borrero; Jolene R Sy
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2008

3.  Integrating caregiver report with systematic choice assessment to enhance reinforcer identification.

Authors:  W W Fisher; C C Piazza; L G Bowman; A Amari
Journal:  Am J Ment Retard       Date:  1996-07

4.  Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences.

Authors:  I G DeLeon; B A Iwata
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1996

5.  Relative versus absolute reinforcement effects: implications for preference assessments.

Authors:  E M Roscoe; B A Iwata; S Kahng
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1999

6.  Effects of subject- versus experimenter-selected reinforcers on the behavior of individuals with profound developmental disabilities.

Authors:  R G Smith; B A Iwata; B A Shore
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1995

7.  Evaluation of a brief multiple-stimulus preference assessment in a naturalistic context.

Authors:  J E Carr; A C Nicolson; T S Higbee
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2000

Review 8.  Preference assessment procedures for individuals with developmental disabilities.

Authors:  Louis P Hagopian; Ethan S Long; Karena S Rush
Journal:  Behav Modif       Date:  2004-09

9.  Effects of psychotherapy with children and adolescents revisited: a meta-analysis of treatment outcome studies.

Authors:  J R Weisz; B Weiss; S S Han; D A Granger; T Morton
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 17.737

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Applied Behavior Analysis is a Science and, Therefore, Progressive.

Authors:  Justin B Leaf; Ronald Leaf; John McEachin; Mitchell Taubman; Shahla Ala'i-Rosales; Robert K Ross; Tristram Smith; Mary Jane Weiss
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2016-02

2.  Promoting Functional Activity Engagement in People with Multiple Disabilities through the Use of Microswitch-Aided Programs.

Authors:  Giulio E Lancioni; Nirbhay N Singh; Mark F O'Reilly; Jeff Sigafoos; Gloria Alberti; Viviana Perilli; Francesca Campodonico
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2017-08-10
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.