Literature DB >> 15296524

Preference assessment procedures for individuals with developmental disabilities.

Louis P Hagopian1, Ethan S Long, Karena S Rush.   

Abstract

Significant advancements have been made in the development of procedures to systematically identify preferred stimuli that may function as reinforcers for persons with developmental disabilities. Indirect assessment procedures include care provider and client interviews, whereas direct assessment procedures involve systematically exposing participants to stimuli while recording their responses. These types of direct assessment procedures can be categorized as either approach-based or engagement-based. Approach-based procedures involve recording the individuals' approach responses to stimuli presented singly or concurrently with other stimuli, whereas engagement-based procedures involve recording duration of engagement with stimuli. Although the predictive validity of indirect preference assessment procedures has yet to be established, using them in combination with direct measures of preference may be most efficacious for identifying potential reinforcers. Recent research on preference assessment procedures used with persons with developmental disabilities is reviewed and the variables that one might consider prior to selecting which procedure to use in a given situation are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15296524     DOI: 10.1177/0145445503259836

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Modif        ISSN: 0145-4455


  18 in total

1.  Evaluation of the rate of problem behavior maintained by different reinforcers across preference assessments.

Authors:  Soyeon Kang; Mark F O'Reilly; Christina L Fragale; Jeannie M Aguilar; Mandy Rispoli; Russell Lang
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2011

2.  A systematic examination of different parameters of presession exposure to tangible stimuli that maintain problem behavior.

Authors:  Mark O'Reilly; Russell Lang; Tonya Davis; Mandy Rispoli; Wendy Machalicek; Jeff Sigafoos; Giulio Lancioni; Robert Didden
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2009

3.  Applications of Preference Assessment Procedures in Depression and Agitation Management in Elders with Dementia.

Authors:  Leilani Feliciano; Mary E Steers; Alexandra Elite-Marcandonatou; Maura McLane; Patricia A Areán
Journal:  Clin Gerontol       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 2.619

4.  The emergence of autoclitic frames in atypically and typically developing children as a function of multiple exemplar instruction.

Authors:  Nicole Luke; R Douglas Greer; Jessica Singer-Dudek; Dolleen-Day Keohane
Journal:  Anal Verbal Behav       Date:  2011

5.  Assessing preferences of individuals with developmental disabilities: a survey of current practices.

Authors:  Richard B Graff; Amanda M Karsten
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2012

6.  Teaching receptive language skills: recommendations for instructors.

Authors:  Laura Grow; Linda LeBlanc
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2013

7.  Correspondence between single versus daily preference assessment outcomes and reinforcer efficacy under progressive-ratio schedules.

Authors:  Nathan A Call; Nicole M Trosclair-Lasserre; Addie J Findley; Andrea R Reavis; M Alice Shillingsburg
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2012

8.  Evaluating preference assessments for use in the general education population.

Authors:  Jennifer L Resetar; George H Noell
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2008

9.  Predicting Optimal Preference Assessment Methods for Individuals with Developmental Disabilities.

Authors:  Kendra M Thomson; Diana Czarnecki; Toby L Martin; C T Yu; Garry L Martin
Journal:  Educ Train Dev Disabil       Date:  2007-03

10.  Early response distribution and outcomes of response-restriction analyses.

Authors:  Sean P Peterson; Anna Ingeborg Petursdottir; Claire L Kirk
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2012
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.